Hi list,
I just came across this GitX ticket Replace GitX port with GitX-dev” [1]
because I wanted to file a ticket for it…
Now I see that it doesn’t make much sense to do so, since the original GitX
hasn’t been touched for years, obviously.
So, I wonder whether it is worth waiting for the
Hi Stef,
On 11 May 2014, at 17:17 , Stef stephane.bachel...@gmail.com wrote:
There is tig which is like a GUI but in terminal.
that looks cool enough and seems to be alive!
There is even a tig 2.0.2 out now, but not yet on MacPorts...
As an alternative you can use the Atlassian GUI which is
On Sunday, May 11, 2014, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
Hi Stef,
On 11 May 2014, at 17:17 , Stef
stephane.bachel...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stephane.bachel...@gmail.com');
wrote:
There is tig which is like a GUI but in terminal.
that looks cool enough and seems to be alive!
On 11 May 2014, at 22:52 , Stef stephane.bachel...@gmail.com wrote:
It's alive and awesome.
Yes, indeed.
Didn't knew it was not yet on MacPorts.
Well, I have 2.0.2 locally running and posted an enhancement ticket [1].
It is open maintainer and I could have committed it, but I wait for Clemens
Hi,
I just came across this GitX ticket Replace GitX port with GitX-dev” [1]
because I wanted to file a ticket for it…
Now I see that it doesn’t make much sense to do so, since the original GitX
hasn’t been touched for years, obviously.
You could help by writing a Portfile for GitX-dev. I
I was only hypothesizing what the eventual fix might end up being, if
you did actually file a ticket... if you want to go editing the
Portfile yourself, though, I would recommend reading up on some of the
wiki pages on Portfile development. Also remember to Reply All so
that the conversation stays
