In fact, certain changes in 10.9 (like with Mail.app) have gotten me to
investigate KDE for alternatives ... And 10.6 still has Rosetta (and frankly,
how much would it have cost to provide that tech as an optional install?)
A lot. Rosetta was not just an application you could install,
On Oct 11, 2014, at 4:23 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Friday October 10 2014 23:56:09 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
Ports using these series will be migrated to Python 2.7 or 3.4 as
appropriate. New ports will only use 2.7 and 3.4 (and 3.5, when it is
released).
Will there also be
On Saturday October 11 2014 06:27:33 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
What exactly do you mean by cleaning up? I've already seen many commits go
through with old python ports being added to the new py-graveyard port.
This should facilitate upgrades by making the old ports replaced_by the new
versions.
On Oct 11, 2014, at 4:31 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
No. Snow Leopard no longer receives updates of any sort, and Lion will
likely follow as soon as Yosemite drops.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222
I see they still haven't produced an EOL statement (is 10.6 Server still for
sale??), we
On Oct 11, 2014, at 6:38 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Saturday October 11 2014 06:27:33 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
What exactly do you mean by cleaning up? I've already seen many commits go
through with old python ports being added to the new py-graveyard port.
This should facilitate upgrades
On Saturday October 11 2014 06:53:27 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Obviously, the naming is intentional. p5.12-X ports use perl5.12, p5.16-X
ports use perl5.16, etc.
I don't understand. If a port depends on p5.12-X, then it will use p5.12-X.
Obviously, yes. But what if a port depends on
On 10 Oct 2014, at 23:45, Greg Earle wrote:
On Oct 10, 2014, at 16:06 PM, Barrie Stott zen146...@zen.co.uk wrote:
On 10 Oct 2014, at 15:27, Brandon Allbery wrote:
That said, 10.6 being unsupported by Apple, it is possible that your best
bet is to copy /bin/bash to /bin/bash.apple and
On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Barrie Stott wrote:
I have no objection at all to rebuilding Apple's /bin/bash and /bin/sh when
all I have to do is run the given script. However, Greg, do I need to do it?
I already have shellshock-proof versions of bash 4.3.27. Is there something
special
On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:01 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Saturday October 11 2014 06:53:27 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Obviously, the naming is intentional. p5.12-X ports use perl5.12, p5.16-X
ports use perl5.16, etc.
I don't understand. If a port depends on p5.12-X, then it will use p5.12-X.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:31 AM, René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, you can. Either update the addresses in your
/etc/apt/sources.list and sources.list.d/*
Ubuntu is moderately infamous for even stepping up one version not working;
multiple versions in a single go usually fails in
On 11 Oct 2014, at 13:35, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Barrie Stott wrote:
I have no objection at all to rebuilding Apple's /bin/bash and /bin/sh when
all I have to do is run the given script. However, Greg, do I need to do it?
I already have shellshock-proof versions
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org
wrote:
It's the version of bash the scripts that came with your operating system
were tested with. It's possible there are backwards-incompatible changes in
bash 4.
There are definitely backwards incompatible changes; most
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:10 AM, René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux Mint is right to do so because they have a habit of modifying things
to their own tastes and against established rules
...which they picked up from Ubuntu and is why Ubuntu upgrades are risky
--
brandon s
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:07 AM, René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's time for me to get re-acquainted with TcL ... ;)
MacPorts' filter syntax has nothing to do with Tcl, aside from happening to
have been written in it; it's also been around for over a decade. :p
Perhaps getting
On Oct 11, 2014, at 8:07 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Saturday October 11 2014 07:40:16 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
If a port depends on p5.12-X but p5.16-X would work, the port should update
its dependency. 5.16 is the default version of perl in MacPorts at this time
which all ports that
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:37 AM, René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
...which they picked up from Ubuntu and is why Ubuntu upgrades are
risky
I'm not so sure about that ...
I am. Ubuntu takes a lot of things from testing and does its own release
engineering, but misses a lot of stuff
Akonadi depends on boost. When you installed boost, did you change the
compiler used? If so, this may be the issue. I found out the hard way
and forced boost to use the Macports GCC 4.7, and as time went on, I
found that ports depending on boost need to be built with the same compiler.
On
El 11/10/2014, a las 6:25, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk escribió:
A lot. Rosetta was not just an application you could install, but an
extension of the underlying OS to provide the translation layer for PowerPC
applications. It would need to be kept in sync with any updates to the
On 11 Oct 2014, at 8:13 pm, C.T. semaphor...@yahoo.com wrote:
El 11/10/2014, a las 6:25, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk escribió:
A lot. Rosetta was not just an application you could install, but an
extension of the underlying OS to provide the translation layer for PowerPC
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
wrote:
Did Apple make that scanner ? I presume not, in which case its not Apples
responsibility to provide drivers for all possible third party devices, but
the vender of those devices. If they choose not to provide an Intel
On Oct 11, 2014, at 11:39 AM, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
Which isn't exhaustive ...
It's not exhaustive, but it's close. Both requested ports and command-line
logical operators are covered.
vq
___
macports-users mailing list
On 11.10.2014, at 21:22, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
But now 10.6 has less of the automation and integration we love from OS X.
Using its Safari is now strongly discouraged because of security flaws. I
absolutely need two independent browsers, and I won't install a Google
Apple didn't make the scanner, but when they cut something the software relies
upon to work, that's Apple's responsibility. Of course it would much easier if
there were no patent on Rosetta's technology, where it could have been released
as open source.
El 11/10/2014, a las 17:25, Dominik
On 12 Oct 2014, at 1:20 am, C.T. semaphor...@yahoo.com wrote:
Apple didn't make the scanner, but when they cut something the software
relies upon to work, that's Apple's responsibility.
Apple did not just cut it with no warning, vendors where given plenty of
warning via, for instance,
On 12 Oct 2014, at 6:13 am, C.T.
semaphor...@yahoo.commailto:semaphor...@yahoo.com wrote:
Apple never provided a suitable replacement for my scanner driver that would
render Rosetta unnecessary.
I have an old Canon N670U. It never had Mac drivers, as far as I know.
However I can run it
25 matches
Mail list logo
