2011 01:56
To: Ryan Schmidt
Cc: macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
Subject: Re: How do I get etherape to work in OS X 10.6.6?
Hi Ryan,
I will just use the gcc 4.4 in the ports to bootstrap gcc 4.5.2, avoiding the
older gcc that Apple provides.
I used to do a lot builds and packaging of GNU
I made a small progress. I decided to download the latest stable
etherape-0.9.10 source and build it myself, using libraries that were built
when I was trying out the macports version.
Once I sudo myself into root, I performed the following. Now I can see IP
addresses, but still not node
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for your note. I am looking into bootstrapping GCC 4.5.2 using GCC from
MacPorts first, then I will build the entire tool chain, and then I will make
another attempt. I will also avoid building the universal variant, which IMHO
complicates things.
I am sure Etherape
Hello
Well, I guess there are more processes involved, I'm just suggesting that maybe
you may find
differences of priorites in the process group with the respective Os's. And
this is without knowing exactly what kind of information htop disclosures about
the underlying processes.
I guess
On Mar 7, 2011, at 14:06, Zack Perry wrote:
Thanks for your note. I am looking into bootstrapping GCC 4.5.2 using GCC
from MacPorts first, then I will build the entire tool chain, and then I will
make another attempt. I will also avoid building the universal variant,
which IMHO
Hi Ryan,
I will just use the gcc 4.4 in the ports to bootstrap gcc 4.5.2, avoiding the
older gcc that Apple provides.
I used to do a lot builds and packaging of GNU and other free software in Sun
Solaris (SPARC/UltraSPARC hosts mostly) for the company I worked for, so I am
used to this kind
Recently, to test a network software I need to use OS X on a MacBook Pro2,1,
which runs OS X 10.6.6, has two GB RAM, 2.33Ghz Intel Core 2 Due CPU, and 160GB
HD. The MacBook is always updated via Apple's software update, and I have
installed the latest XCode just a few days ago from Apple's
On 2011-03-06 20:49 , Zack Perry wrote:
Moving on to 2, it has many dependencies, so downloading all sources,
and building took a long time. Once done, in a xterm, I did sudo
etherape to test, and promptly got the following:
Dynamic session lookup supported but failed: launchd did not
Hi Tommy,
Thanks for your response. As I stated in my post, wireshark 1.4.4 works well
for me, but Etherape doesn't. My problems are with Etherape, not with
wireshark :-)
--Zack
Hello.
I just installed Wireshark version 1.4.0 and can't remember doing anything but
installed it.
Since
