python24 +puredarwin

2008-06-18 Thread Martin Stadler
Hi! I'm using python24 with the puredarwin variant because it seems to fit better with virtual python, easy install and Plone. Then I upgraded my Python and now it looks like the puredarwin variant was not used. Now I uninstalled and cleaned everything and tried to install but I get

Re: python24 +puredarwin

2008-06-18 Thread Martin Stadler
://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#creating-a-virtual-python Am 18.06.2008 um 15:11 schrieb Kenneth Miller: Martin, I've never used the +puredarwin option, what does it give you? I just generally use sudo port install python24 Regards, Ken On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:34 AM, Martin

Re: python24 +puredarwin

2008-06-18 Thread Rainer Müller
Martin Stadler wrote: I'm not shure about the details but Python is installed as a OS X framework in /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework Python packages are not installed in the standard site-packages directory and virtual python[1] is not working with setuptools this

Re: python24 +puredarwin

2008-06-18 Thread Martin Stadler
Am 18.06.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Rainer Müller: Martin Stadler wrote: I'm not shure about the details but Python is installed as a OS X framework in /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework Python packages are not installed in the standard site-packages directory and virtual

Re: python24 +puredarwin

2008-06-18 Thread Kenneth Miller
/DevCenter/EasyInstall#creating-a-virtual-python Am 18.06.2008 um 15:11 schrieb Kenneth Miller: Martin, I've never used the +puredarwin option, what does it give you? I just generally use sudo port install python24 Regards, Ken On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:34 AM, Martin Stadler wrote: Hi

Re: python24 +puredarwin

2008-06-18 Thread Martin Stadler
Am 18.06.2008 um 16:06 schrieb Mike: What advantage is there to using python from ports vs the native osx python installation in /usr/bin/ ? -mike Well, using Macports I follow the philosophy not to play around (install additional packages i.e.) with the system frameworks but having

Re: PureDarwin?

2007-04-30 Thread Chuck Remes
PM, Randall Wood wrote: It looks to me like puredarwin.org is something like what opendarwin.org wanted to have: a fully functional darwin-based desktop/server OS other than Mac OS X. On 29 Apr 2007, at 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know anything about PureDarwin [1]? I assume

PureDarwin?

2007-04-29 Thread cremes . devlist
Anyone know anything about PureDarwin [1]? I assume if it actually gets some traction that there will be MacPorts support for it. ?? [1] http://puredarwin.org/ ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http

Re: PureDarwin?

2007-04-29 Thread Randall Wood
It looks to me like puredarwin.org is something like what opendarwin.org wanted to have: a fully functional darwin-based desktop/server OS other than Mac OS X. On 29 Apr 2007, at 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know anything about PureDarwin [1]? I assume if it actually gets some

Re: PureDarwin?

2007-04-29 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
PureDarwin [1]? I assume if it actually gets some traction that there will be MacPorts support for it. Probably not. We tried supporting darwin and opendarwin installations, but the developers and port maintainers generally were unable to test on those systems, so support got dropped. ?? [1