On 2007-08-15 01:29:09 -0400, Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 22:23, Sean Fulton wrote:
On 2007-08-13 02:40:21 -0400, Anders F Björklund said:
mpu78 wrote:
I'm a Unix user who is new to Mac and MacPorts. I've just started
installing
things using `port' today,
Le 15 août 07 à 16:36, Sean Fulton a écrit :
On 2007-08-15 01:29:09 -0400, Ryan Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 22:23, Sean Fulton wrote:
On 2007-08-13 02:40:21 -0400, Anders F Björklund said:
mpu78 wrote:
I'm a Unix user who is new to Mac and MacPorts. I've just
On 2007-08-13 02:40:21 -0400, Anders F Björklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mpu78 wrote:
I'm a Unix user who is new to Mac and MacPorts. I've just started installing
things using `port' today, i.e. after the release of MacPorts 1.5.1, which I
understand does these `mtree' checks.
I'm not able
On Aug 14, 2007, at 22:23, Sean Fulton wrote:
On 2007-08-13 02:40:21 -0400, Anders F Björklund said:
mpu78 wrote:
I'm a Unix user who is new to Mac and MacPorts. I've just started
installing
things using `port' today, i.e. after the release of MacPorts
1.5.1, which I
understand does
' with:
Error: violation by /opt/local/man
Error: Target org.macports.destroot returned: mtree violation!
and `gnome-doc-utils' with the same error on the way to installing other
things.
What should I do?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/mtree-violations-tf4259267
Hi,
I'm not able to install much without getting the mtree violation
error. It
fails to install `Xemacs' with:
Error: violation by /opt/local/man
Error: Target org.macports.destroot returned: mtree violation!
and `gnome-doc-utils' with the same error on the way to installing
other
On Aug 11, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
I just added and committed workaround to the Portfile to indicate
the violation is intended in this case, destroot.violate_mtree
yes. Please re-sync your tree in about half an hour from this
posting and try installing again, report
I get the same error for php5
Just thought I would throw that into the ring as well.
(think my last post got deleted, sorry if this produces a double post)
Jeff Stubbs-3 wrote:
On Aug 11, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
I just added and committed workaround to the
