On 29/3/10 04:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 21:44, ~suv wrote:
Compiling Inkscape 0.47 fails due to the upgrade of poppler to
0.12.4
corresponding upstream bug report: Bug #487038 in Inkscape: “0.47
build error with poppler 0.12.2 on Linux”:
On 2010-03-29 05:53 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 22:32, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2010-03-29 04:47 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The patch in comment #4 should NOT be added; further comments later in the
bug report (e.g. comment #6) explain how horrible that patch is. We should
On 2010-03-29 05:32 , Rainer Müller wrote:
Gentoo is using this patch to fix the issue, which looks simpler
(originated at Fedora):
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-gfx/inkscape/files/inkscape-0.47-poppler.patch?view=markup
Committed in r65641.
Rainer
Macports 1.8.2 clean install, fresh selfupdate, first thing I tried to
install is inkscape, it goes off and compiles and installs a bunch of
stuff, and failes when it gets to inkscape:
--- Building inkscape
DEBUG: Executing org.macports.build (inkscape)
DEBUG: Environment:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 21:16, Michael Parson wrote:
Macports 1.8.2 clean install, fresh selfupdate, first thing I tried to
install is inkscape, it goes off and compiles and installs a bunch of stuff,
and failes when it gets to inkscape:
--- Building inkscape
DEBUG: Executing
On 29/3/10 04:16, Michael Parson wrote:
Macports 1.8.2 clean install, fresh selfupdate, first thing I tried to
install is inkscape, it goes off and compiles and installs a bunch of
stuff, and failes when it gets to inkscape:
Compiling Inkscape 0.47 fails due to the upgrade of poppler to 0.12.4
On Mar 28, 2010, at 21:44, ~suv wrote:
On 29/3/10 04:16, Michael Parson wrote:
Macports 1.8.2 clean install, fresh selfupdate, first thing I tried to
install is inkscape, it goes off and compiles and installs a bunch of
stuff, and failes when it gets to inkscape:
Compiling Inkscape 0.47
On 2010-03-29 04:47 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The patch in comment #4 should NOT be added; further comments later in the
bug report (e.g. comment #6) explain how horrible that patch is. We should
probably be using whatever fix is being talked about in comment #19 instead.
That would be:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 22:32, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2010-03-29 04:47 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The patch in comment #4 should NOT be added; further comments later in the
bug report (e.g. comment #6) explain how horrible that patch is. We should
probably be using whatever fix is being talked
