Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I'm pretty sure one can make it build without 10.7 SDK, it will just > take quite a bit of work to do so. Perhaps you know if there is an > elegant way to actually patch the code in a way that would be > acceptable for upstream in case we manage to find a sufficient set of

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > When I first heard about it, over a year ago, I tried to sign my wife up > and the only thing offered for free was Safari Extension developement and > that free program was dropped at the same time as they reorganized the >

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Nov 2, 2016, at 10:49 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Nov 2, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Al Varnell wrote: >>> On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Varnell wrote: Most

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

Wouldn’t it just be a treat if Jeremy fixed libsdl2’s code and this all went away :> Ken > On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:49 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Nov 2, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Al Varnell wrote: >>> On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:38 PM,

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Nov 2, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Al Varnell wrote: >> On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Varnell wrote: >>> Most users don't have access to Apple's developer download site and cannot >>> be

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > Most users don't have access to Apple's developer download site and cannot be > expected to pay $99 to be able to do so. > > Um? $99 is only if you want signing certificates. The Mac

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Nov 2, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Varnell wrote: >> Most users don't have access to Apple's developer download site and cannot >> be expected to pay $99 to be able to

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > Most users don't have access to Apple's developer download site and cannot > be expected to pay $99 to be able to do so. Um? $99 is only if you want signing certificates. The Mac Developer subscription granting access to

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On Nov 2, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> Why would you do that? It can be downloaded from the Apple developer web >> site (in a newer version of Xcode). > > Well, everyone seems to feel it’s way to difficult to expect a user to do > that, so I’m trying to help you come up with an

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> > Why would you do that? It can be downloaded from the Apple developer web site > (in a newer version of Xcode). Well, everyone seems to feel it’s way to difficult to expect a user to do that, so I’m trying to help you come up with an easier way. Of course, I just downloaded the darned

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Nov 2, 2016, at 10:11 PM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > >> That's just: >> >> #if MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED < 1070 >> # error SDL for Mac OS X must be built with a 10.7 SDK or above. >> #endif /* MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED < 1070 */ >> > > that’s what

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> That's just: > > #if MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED < 1070 > # error SDL for Mac OS X must be built with a 10.7 SDK or above. > #endif /* MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED < 1070 */ > that’s what I meant when I referred to using availability macros - sorry if it was the wrong term. Mojca did an

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Nov 2, 2016, at 09:31, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > On 2016-11-02, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > >> Do you know *why* it is requiring the 10.7 SDK to build? Why can't libsdl2 >> use the 10.6 SDK effectively? >> > > I took a quick

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 2016-11-02, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > Do you know *why* it is requiring the 10.7 SDK to build? Why can't libsdl2 > use the 10.6 SDK effectively? > I took a quick look at the code. It has a lot of AVAILABILITY_ macros in it, a few mentioning 10.7, most of them

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 2 November 2016 at 10:03, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > Do you know *why* it is requiring the 10.7 SDK to build? Why can't libsdl2 > use the 10.6 SDK effectively? See my analysis at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52210#comment:9 I'm pretty sure one can make it build without 10.7

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 2 November 2016 at 09:46, Davide Liessi wrote: > 2016-10-30 15:38 GMT+01:00 Ryan Schmidt: >> copying the 10.7 SDK into /Developer/SDKs is the simplest solution. > > How can I get a copy of the 10.7 SDK? > I have only the 10.5 and 10.6 SDKs on my machine. I didn't test this, but I guess that

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

Do you know *why* it is requiring the 10.7 SDK to build? Why can't libsdl2 use the 10.6 SDK effectively? > On Oct 31, 2016, at 20:44, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > >> >> I’d be happy to test the minimum requirements to build it, if Richard >> doesn’t beat me to

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 2016-10-31, at 2:28 AM, René J. V. Bertin wrote: > > Probably an open door, possibly a forbidden one: it may be relevant here to > block concerned ports at the latest supported version for legacy platforms? Although I think not needed for libsdl2 (which builds and works without issue on

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

David Evans wrote: > However, sdl/sdl2 provides the only audio/video outdev that we support in > MacPorts which means that if you have to have one or the other. Without an > outdev, ffplay will not be configured/built and you'll have no direct way to > play audio/video with ffmpeg. It's been

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

Oh — I see that there’s a lot of build info in docs/ README-macosx.md in there it says you need minimum Xcode 4.6 and the 10.7 SDK (maybe that’s why macports-clang-3.7 worked for me?) and a lot more info that I didn’t read fully through. Ken > On Oct 30, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Ken

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> > Agreed, the problem here is with libsdl2. We need to understand what the > problem is on > 10.6 at least and either help upstream to fix it or fix it ourselves. Dave, I may not be seeing the entire picture (often happens!), but I don’t think there is actually a problem on 10.6. It uses

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 10/30/16 1:13 AM, Davide Liessi wrote: > 2016-10-30 1:23 GMT+02:00 Ryan Schmidt : >> If sdl2 can be built on Snow Leopard using a copy of the 10.7 SDK obtained >> from a later Xcode, and that sdl2 then works ok on Snow Leopard, then I'd be >> happy if we could come up

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> I can do that on the buildbot machines, and we can write the libsdl2 > portfile so that it uses that SDK if available and instructs the user how to > download and install it if it's not yet there. The portfile is already written like that. Also, see:

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 10/29/16 4:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Oct 29, 2016, at 5:32 PM, David Evans wrote: >> >> On 10/28/16 9:58 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >>> Am I right in thinking that ffmpeg now requires libsdl2 while it >>> previously required libsdl? That causes ffmpeg to

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 16:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Oct 29, 2016, at 5:32 PM, David Evans wrote: >> >> On 10/28/16 9:58 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >>> Am I right in thinking that ffmpeg now requires libsdl2 while it >>> previously

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> > If sdl2 can be built on Snow Leopard using a copy of the 10.7 SDK obtained > from a later Xcode, and that sdl2 then works ok on Snow Leopard, then I'd be > happy if we could come up with an official way to support that, and then we > could do that on the buildbot, which would cover a lot

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 5:32 PM, David Evans wrote: > > On 10/28/16 9:58 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >> Am I right in thinking that ffmpeg now requires libsdl2 while it previously >> required libsdl? That causes ffmpeg to fail on 10.6.x, because libsdl2 >> fails: >>

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

On 10/28/16 9:58 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Am I right in thinking that ffmpeg now requires libsdl2 while it previously > required libsdl? That causes ffmpeg to fail on 10.6.x, because libsdl2 fails: > > Error: org.macports.fetch for port libsdl2 returned: Building libsdl2 > requires OS

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

Hi Richard You have a lot of Xcode versions installed! Keeping them all straight must be a bit of a mind-bender. perhaps select the most modern one (Xcode 4.2) and put the macOSX10.7.sdk in there? > ld: library not found for -lcrt1.10.6.o that's a bit weird. that's a basic library. In the

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

I know -- I'm sorry for stepping out there and just blurting it like that. I'm just trying to help Richard 'get it done'. Also - I upgraded libsdl to the new 2.0.5 version here -- perhaps i should put up a diff for JMR to use? Best, Ken $ port -v installed | grep ffmpeg ffmpeg

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 12:05 AM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > libsdl2 will build without trouble on 10.6.8 if you find a copy of the 10.7 > SDK and put it like so in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.7.sdk That is not a procedure we have ever recommended users do

Re: 10.6.8 and ffmpeg

Thanks - closer, but must be more to it than that: h-3.2# ls -ld /Dev* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 16 Aug 23 20:42 /Developer -> /Developer-3.2.6 drwxrwxr-x@ 20 root admin 680 Nov 16 2010 /Developer-3.2.2 drwxrwxr-x@ 16 root admin 544 Aug 23 19:50 /Developer-3.2.6 drwxrwxr-x 14 root admin