On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 09:31 +0200, Ortwin Glück wrote:
>
> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > One could also argue that a mailing list should never set a Reply-To:,
> > as the list server doesn't know how the original sender want's to
> > receive any replies.
>
> That's not the point. It's all about usabilit
Tino Keitel wrote:
> One could also argue that a mailing list should never set a Reply-To:,
> as the list server doesn't know how the original sender want's to
> receive any replies.
That's not the point. It's all about usability. If I hit the Reply
button on a mail from a list, I *expect* it t
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 15:40:17 +0200, Ortwin Glück wrote:
> By the way, if someone else is annoyed that this list doesn't set the
> Reply-To in a useful way, then here is a .procmail instruction to fix this:
One could also argue that a mailing list should never set a Reply-To:,
as the list serv
Hey gimli,
Could you please change this behaviour? I think it's annoying everyone.
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/admin/mactel-linux-users
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/admin/mactel-linux-devel
On the main page, "Reply-To: header munging", please check that the
first option is "No".
By the way, if someone else is annoyed that this list doesn't set the
Reply-To in a useful way, then here is a .procmail instruction to fix this:
# add mactel-linux Reply-To
:0fw
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| formail -I "Reply-To: [email protected]"
---
