Re: ANNOUNCE: Internet Communications SoftwareUpdate for N800

2007-07-31 Thread zeeshan.ali
Hello! I'm not having any luck using DTMF with rtcomm's sofia-sip and asterisk. Is there a trick to it? Nope! No tricks and no portions needed. :) BTW, I don't think asterisk supports RFC 4733. Does sofia-sip speak anything else? RFC 2833 maybe? There isn't any significant difference

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Lauri Leukkunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Continuing on the topic of build dependencies, SB2 has an open design issue regarding them. [...] I played a bit with sbox2 and I failed in the end, probably because I didn't use the right toolchain, but while doing that, a picture slowly formed in

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Lauri Leukkunen
On 31/07/07 11:56 +0300, ext Marius Vollmer wrote: Also, both sbox1 and sbox2 redirect whole packages, not just binaries (if I understand sbox2 correctly). E.g., when redirecting the perl command, the redirected-to perl will take its modules from the redirected-to prefix, not from the

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:56:12AM +0300, ext Marius Vollmer wrote: Then there would be a way for the user to select whether or not to make /usr/bin/perl be the armel or i386 version. I know this sounds like a trite reply, but I have actually read your entire mail. However: Sounds like you

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Igor Stoppa
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 13:11 +0300, ext Lauri Leukkunen wrote: You could take the current emulate mode as a template and start adding to that your exceptions. Maybe it's a matter of sb developer's vs sb user's point of view, but I would rather consider sb to be the exception ... -- Cheers,

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Lauri Leukkunen
On 31/07/07 13:52 +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 13:11 +0300, ext Lauri Leukkunen wrote: You could take the current emulate mode as a template and start adding to that your exceptions. Maybe it's a matter of sb developer's vs sb user's point of view, but I would rather

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Marius Vollmer
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sounds like you want multiarch. Yes, I know I want multiarch. :) Is it ready? ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Sound setup question?

2007-07-31 Thread jasmar
I have packaged recordMyDesktop (pretty simple: one binary) compiled to use OSS and another to use ALSA but I can not seem to get them to work. Both of them tell me the sound card is not configured. I could use some suggestions from anybody not alot of info on the web.

Custom kernel - WLAN problem (sk_buff, panic)

2007-07-31 Thread Nils Faerber
Hello! I've been trying to add additional features to the N800's kernel which change the size (and contents) of the sk_buff struct (include/linux/skbuff.h). In short, I want to mark some network packages and add some information about them. The problem is that the sk_buff struct is shared by

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Carlos Guerreiro
components should be pushed to debian and ubuntu and get those bigger communities involved in their development. One day we will anyway be Indeed. When it comes to Hildon that is certainly starting to happen now. This should be the default mode for most of the stuff we do. Arguing

Re: sbox2 maemo

2007-07-31 Thread Carlos Guerreiro
ext Andrew J. Barr wrote: On 7/31/07, Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happens on top of the Maemo platform is a different discussion altogether. FWIW, I think that there is a distinction between maemo the platform and the ITOS firmware that not everyone has grasped.