Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote: Ryan Abel wrote: KeyEnglish i18n Examples user/development ProgrammingPy2Deb In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail end of the key. For consistency, could the English string in this

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Ryan Abel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote: In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail end of the key. For consistency, could the English string in this case be Development? Well, it's

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Neil Jerram
2008/10/29 Andrew Flegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1) Consistency - with what? Why is consistency between the package maintainer's key and the displayed text /in one language/ important? 2) These are *example* English versions. Further discussions have resulted in other

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Agree with all that. However, if Programming is a better English term than Development - which I agree with - surely the section name should be users/programming? Why, though? The technical English keys better map

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Ryan Abel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So while they should be valid, localized sections from h-a-m's point of view, they shouldn't be valid sections for packages (I don't want to see any debs with user/other or user/all ;)). Yes, very good point.

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Neil Jerram
2008/10/29 Andrew Flegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Agree with all that. However, if Programming is a better English term than Development - which I agree with - surely the section name should be users/programming? Why,

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Quim Gil
ext Ryan Abel wrote: On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote: However, although I think the new UI is an improvement, it shouldn't be the UI which gets into fremantle's Application Manager for the default starting point of installing an app; it should be *much* prettier, with

RE: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Simon Pickering
- Development worklow? Do you want to have a structured process with an agreed set of features in scope, a UI plan and so on or do you see better to continue the ad hoc approach of discussion+patches? Specially if you expect us providing i.e. nice icons this is not something that needs

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Ryan Abel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The community has plans, Nokia, but they're really hard to act on unless we know what you're up to. Help us to help you. :) The Application manager for Fremantle is developed openly: http://hildon-app-mgr.garage.maemo.org/devel.html Sources are now

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Application manager for Fremantle is developed openly: http://hildon-app-mgr.garage.maemo.org/devel.html Glad to see this has been updated :-) Sources are now on Gitorious:

Needing help with dead unit.

2008-10-29 Thread Tim Ashman
Hopefully someone can help me. Nokia's phone support wants me to send the unit in and I'm just not going to do that. Here is my problem. Last night I nuked the ability of my n810 to boot. I came in this morning downloaded the windows flasher utility and proceeded to try and reflash the

Re: Needing help with dead unit.

2008-10-29 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 29, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Tim Ashman wrote: I tried the linux manual way. I went to my other computer downloaded the flash command utility and proceeded to the get the image page. I entered in my WLAN ID and the page reports that it is not a valid product. Great. Did you go to

Re: Needing help with dead unit.

2008-10-29 Thread Tim Ashman
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:30:51 am Ryan Abel wrote: On Oct 29, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Tim Ashman wrote: I tried the linux manual way. I went to my other computer downloaded the flash command utility and proceeded to the get the image page. I entered in my WLAN ID and the page

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-29 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Andrew Flegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sources are now on Gitorious: http://gitorious.org/projects/hildon-application-manager Why the move to git? Is this just some tool fetishism or did the svn on garage not

Re: Needing help with dead unit.

2008-10-29 Thread pierre . amadio
Hi there. On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:00:20AM -0700, Tim Ashman wrote: On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:30:51 am Ryan Abel wrote: Did you go to the correct page for your unit? I did, not only that when I was on the phone with tech support I asked him to check my ID number and he told me it