ext Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes:
On 16/12/2009 09:33, Marius Vollmer wrote:
(The main thing missing from debhelper IMO is better support for -dbg
packages.)
Hmmh, what exactly do you need? Because with the tiny.rules, the only
thing needed is the -dbg package declared in
Hi,
i have a simple treeview inside a pannable area. What i want to achieve is
basically simple:
I want the user to be able to select one item and that item should stay
selected until
the user selects a different item. Initially nothing should be selected.
Exactly this is the standard
Hi,
On 18/12/09 12:45, Till Harbaum wrote:
Hi,
Anybody else facing this problem? How can i deselect everything in a treeview
in
state HILDON_UI_MODE_EDIT?
I was having the same problem with a GtkIconView and resorted to calling
gtk_icon_view_unselect_all after showing the widget. I
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Till Harbaum wrote:
i have a simple treeview inside a pannable area. What i want to
achieve is basically simple: I want the user to be able to select
one item and that item should stay selected until the user selects a
different item. Initially
hi,
a couple of my apps landed in extras yesterday and I have added screenshots
and changed the description text for both
but they keep getting reset?
the revision history for the pages shows clearly that I have edited the
text, but something keeps screwing up
these are the descriptions I keep
ext Anderson Lizardo wrote:
Now things might get complex if the packaging already uses some new
features of level 7, like those CDBS-like helper rules. In such cases,
looking at versions prior to the compatibility level upgrade might
help doing the downgrade (and most Debian packages are kept
Hi,
ext Stephan Jaensch wrote:
First of all, my viewpoint as a user: I want as many apps
as possible. Choice is always good. I own an iPod Touch,
and I can say with confidence that my criteria for selecting
an app is always functionality, quality (hard to gauge since
there is no try before
On Fri, December 18, 2009 13:23, Gary Birkett wrote:
hi,
Hi,
a couple of my apps landed in extras yesterday and I have added
screenshots and changed the description text for both but they keep getting
reset?
the revision history for the pages shows clearly that I have edited the
text, but
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Niels Breet ni...@maemo.org wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 13:23, Gary Birkett wrote:
hi,
Hi,
a couple of my apps landed in extras yesterday and I have added
screenshots and changed the description text for both but they keep
getting
reset?
the
Niels Breet wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 13:23, Gary Birkett wrote:
hi,
Hi,
a couple of my apps landed in extras yesterday and I have added
screenshots and changed the description text for both but they keep getting
reset?
the revision history for the pages shows clearly that I have
On Fri, December 18, 2009 01:59, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Mikko Vartiainen mvartiai...@gmail.com
wrote:
would there be a possibility to push them to Extras forcing an update
in the background?
It may be again noted that pushing library updates for end users
On Fri, December 18, 2009 14:30, Cornelius Hald wrote:
Niels Breet wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 13:23, Gary Birkett wrote:
It fetches all information from your package. The idea is that your
package should be 'complete' enough to describe itself.
Would it then be possible to remove
Niels Breet wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 14:30, Cornelius Hald wrote:
Niels Breet wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 13:23, Gary Birkett wrote:
It fetches all information from your package. The idea is that your
package should be 'complete' enough to describe itself.
Would it then be
Hi,
ext Jussi Hakala wrote:
ext Anderson Lizardo wrote:
Now things might get complex if the packaging already uses some new
features of level 7, like those CDBS-like helper rules. In such cases,
looking at versions prior to the compatibility level upgrade might
help doing the downgrade (and
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Eero Tamminen eero.tammi...@nokia.com wrote:
ext Jussi Hakala wrote:
You can also try the debian-squeeze devkit available from scratchbox.org.
Note that this is not (yet) supported by Fremantle SDK and you need to
create your scratchbox targets by hand instead
Hi,
Niels Breet wrote:
User _applications_ should be in user/* categories. (Basically everything
you want the end-user to see and be able to uninstall) Everything else
should never be in user.
Where should it go? The packaging policy[1] only explicitly mentions
user/* sections, as does the
This is bad manner and utterly evil.
User _applications_ should be in user/* categories. (Basically everything
you want the end-user to see and be able to uninstall) Everything else
should never be in user.
There is or is going to be user/hidden category
Hi,
Niels Breet wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 14:30, Cornelius Hald wrote:
Would it then be possible to remove those field from the site where you
can manually edit this information? Because I think there the real
confusion comes from.
To quote myself:
The description field needs to be
However, we've just hit a major regression caused by an attempted Python
optification bugfix with failed QA. Although I believe the issue has
been solved now, I think we need to sit on the package in extras-devel
for a week or so before pushing it to testing (Python optification is
Hi all,
Deadlines are approaching for various Maemo related FOSDEM devrooms:
KDE: http://dot.kde.org/2009/12/15/speakers-wanted-fosdem-2010
Deadline: Jan 3rd
GNOME: http://live.gnome.org/Brussels2010/Devroom
Deadline: Jan 8th
Crossdistro: http://fosdem.org/2010/distrominiconf
Deadline: None
From Mikko Vartiainen [mvartiai...@gmail.com]:
Pymaemo-optify 0.2 has landed Extras (or at least Downloads)
http://maemo.org/downloads/product/Maemo5/pymaemo-optify/
Yep, Lizardo gave me a heads-up today (to my great astonishment).
What happened here and how it's even possible?
We have no
On Fri, December 18, 2009 15:46, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Niels Breet wrote:
On Fri, December 18, 2009 14:30, Cornelius Hald wrote:
Would it then be possible to remove those field from the site where
you can manually edit this information? Because I think there the real
confusion comes
On Fri, December 18, 2009 15:28, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Niels Breet wrote:
User _applications_ should be in user/* categories. (Basically
everything you want the end-user to see and be able to uninstall)
Everything else
should never be in user.
Where should it go? The packaging policy[1]
On Fri, December 18, 2009 15:49, Mikko Vartiainen wrote:
However, we've just hit a major regression caused by an attempted
Python
optification bugfix with failed QA. Although I believe the issue has been
solved now, I think we need to sit on the package in extras-devel for a
week or so before
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Niels Breet ni...@maemo.org wrote:
An application depending on python2.5-minimal got promoted to Extras from
-testing. Python2.5-minimal depends on pymaemo-optify, so that got
promoted too.
Then it was Panucci though a series of dependencies that I can't quite
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Niels Breet ni...@maemo.org wrote:
Developers have python available in SDK and also know how to handle either
red-pill or apt-get.
So, If I understand correctly, developers (even newcomers to the Maemo
world) should have extras-devel enabled on their devices for
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Mikko Vartiainen mvartiai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Niels Breet ni...@maemo.org wrote:
The question is why it shows up in Downloads as it is in section devel and
not in a user/* section. This is something I need to check more closely
Hi
- Alkuperäinen viesti -
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Niels Breet ni...@maemo.org wrote:
Developers have python available in SDK and also know how to handle either
red-pill or apt-get.
So, If I understand correctly, developers (even newcomers to the Maemo
world) should have
2009/12/13 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
On Sunday 13 December 2009 15:13:54 Mustali Dalal wrote:
Purging copyright files does not seem right; they are tiny and have legal
bearing.
Since a lot, if not all, apps currently in testing use GPL or other FOSS
license, I would guess there be good
Hi all,
Just FYI in case anybody wants to play with them:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=126119434601815w=2
They still do not work for booting the 2.6.28 based
Maemo kernel though.
Regards,
Tony
___
maemo-developers mailing list
30 matches
Mail list logo
