Hi,
-Original Message-
From: ext Andre Klapper [mailto:aklap...@openismus.com]
Sent: 18 May, 2010 17:48
To: Dave Neary
Cc: Tikka Jarmo (Nokia-D/Helsinki); maemo-developers@maemo.org; maemo-
commun...@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Proposed reorganization of documentation bug reporting
Hi,
I am working on N900 emulator.
When i use the following commands in my code
getenv(HOME) or getenv(MYDOCSDIR) they give me the path present on
Scratchbox file-system.
N900 emulator contains some folders like Images listed inside File Manager
folder. I want to find path of the Images
Hi Pallavi!
You can use g_get_user_special_dir(G_USER_DIRECTORY_PICTURES);
http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/glib-Miscellaneous-Utility-Functions.html#g-get-user-special-dir
http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/glib-Miscellaneous-Utility-Functions.html#GUserDirectory
Hi Daniil,
I tried using suggested APIs
G_USER_DIRECTORY_DOCUMENTS,
G_USER_DIRECTORY_PICTURES,
G_USER_DIRECTORY_VIDEOS
const char *dir = g_get_user_special_dir (G_USER_DIRECTORY_VIDEOS);
if (dir == NULL)
printf(NULL);
else
printf(%s,dir);
But every time it returns me NULL
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Alberto Garcia agar...@igalia.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:57:45PM +0100, Luca Donaggio wrote:
Which is the best way to resize widgets inside a PannableArea?
I'm writing a callback function to be called when the device
orientation changes and I
Hi Pallavi!
It works on N900 you may file a bug about scratchbox here:
https://bugs.maemo.org/
const char *dir = g_strdup(g_get_user_special_dir (G_USER_DIRECTORY_VIDEOS));
if (!dir) {
dir = g_strconcat (getenv(MYDOCSDIR), /.videos, NULL);
}
printf(%s\n, dir ? dir : NULL);
can u make a sensor flying game plzz i dont have any games and i am
in ira the ovi is blocked plzzz help
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Am Donnerstag, den 20.05.2010, 08:58 +0200 schrieb
jarmo.ti...@nokia.com:
Ok somebody then has just setup a private Bugzilla product for
his/her private bug reports. I think it is then better not to touch
this product at all in case that somebody still uses this...
Yes, I use it (in order to
I am trying to understand why we can't just upload the qt 4.6 deb files used
by scratchbox to extras-development so anybody can easily have access to
applications developed using qt4.6. I understand that maybe some of the new
standard qt4.6 may not work until PR1.2 is out but I haven't seen any
Hi Felipe!
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
I am trying to understand why we can’t just upload the qt 4.6 deb files used
by scratchbox to “extras-development” so anybody can easily have access to
applications developed using qt4.6
These are packages
Foreword: the Qt versioning mismatch problem is not strictly the consequence
of the PR1.2 delay, it is mainly the result of the packaging choice of how Qt
gets updated to newer versions.
On Thursday 20 May 2010 15:26:46 Felipe Crochik wrote:
- If you use the old standard 4.5.3
Hi,
(CCing to maemo-devel as this might contain useful info also
for others.)
ext Dawid Lorenz (maemobile) wrote:
There's one thing missing from these graphs - Modest.
I am pretty sure it could have major impact on memory
usage/performance. Or maybe I'm wrong?
sp-endurance in the public
Attila,
Foreword: the Qt versioning mismatch problem is not strictly the consequence
of the PR1.2 delay, it is mainly the result of the packaging choice of how
Qt
gets updated to newer versions.
I thought the only difference was on where the libraries got installed.
Isn't it? On a follow up
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
I thought the only difference was on where the libraries got installed.
Isn't it? On a follow up question: Why do
the Qt applications have to know where the qt libraries are? Wouldn't be
better/easier if they would look
Attila,
Don’t forget that the incoming Qt version is NOT binary (nor source)
compatible, so you cannot just swap in new libs, you HAVE to use it with the
libs it was compiled with. Another requirement was parallel installs (very
atypical for Qt, as on desktops it IS generally binary backward
On 5/20/10, Felipe Crochik
fel...@crochik.comh/1tqlt06b4so7k/?v=bcs=whto=fel...@crochik.com
wrote:
Isn't the Qt version on PR 1.2 supposed to be 4.6.2 (the same we have on
qt4-maemo5 and scratchbox right now)? I can't remember where I read this
but
No way of knowing until PR1.2 actually hits
Now we're gettingto the crux of the matter. The choice is not to
support all versions of Qt simultaneously, but to have a single base
version for each PR, and have this version on the NAND for speed
reasons IIUC (plus integration issues as mentioned above) - and also
to lower memory footprint,
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
As today what a developer needs to do to get an application that uses qt to
the end user? Is there a way to tell the autobuilder to compile against the
4.5 qt and make the package only depend on it?
The developer should
18 matches
Mail list logo
