Re: creating a .deb package for emacs

2007-09-28 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:11:39 +0200 Daniel M German [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DMG One think I can do is use your package spect to create a version of DMG emacs with -nox. Feel free. I used mud-builder at the time to build the package, which saved me a lot of time. Ted

[maemo-developers] Emacs work: porting to Maemo

2007-01-24 Thread Ted Zlatanov
I'm currently working on porting Emacs to Maemo, and specifically getting the Emacs frames to bring up the pop-up keyboard. Thanks to help from people on #maemo, especially Aaron Levinson, I'm getting somewhere. I can now see the keyboard if I lose focus (click on a menu outside Emacs), and once

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Emacs work: porting to Maemo

2007-01-24 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 24 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:08 -0500, Ted Zlatanov wrote: I'm currently working on porting Emacs to Maemo, It's a small point, but isn't emacs an odd choice for porting to maemo, with emacs being a text editor designed for keyboard use, and all maemo

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Emacs work: porting to Maemo

2007-01-24 Thread Ted Zlatanov
With lots of help from Aaron Levinson, I managed to get the pop-up keyboard to display (Emacs frames have an associated GDK Window I didn't know how to access). Updated patch attached, and more to come. My other questions are still unresolved :) Thanks Ted ? xterm.patch Index: xterm.c

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Emacs work: porting to Maemo

2007-01-24 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 24 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With lots of help from Aaron Levinson, I managed to get the pop-up keyboard to display (Emacs frames have an associated GDK Window I didn't know how to access). Updated patch attached, and more to come. My other questions are still unresolved :) It

Re: [maemo-developers] OS2006 roadmap

2007-01-10 Thread Ted Zlatanov
I think the 770/N800 break with OS support from ITOS2006 to ITOS2007 is reasonable. The 770 was a first-generation device, really the first of its kind. I hope the N800 doesn't get deprecated in the same way, and I hope Nokia at least considers giving some discount to people buying the N800 that

Re: [maemo-developers] OS2006 roadmap

2007-01-10 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 10 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's amazing to me is that someone in charge at Nokia thinks that independant developers are going to flock to develop a market-creating software ecosystem for a $400-$500 half-open platform, especially in light of Apple's recent announcement of the

Re: [maemo-developers] Canola: other apps won't start

2006-12-07 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 7 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Of course I understand that the n770 resources are limited and that I can't expect that many memory intensive apps can run _besides_ Canola. But I am dealing here with a problem when Canola is _not_ running! * Desktop applet switched off * Conola

Re: [maemo-developers] Canola: other apps won't start

2006-12-06 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 5 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed Canola (great app btw) and noticed that other apps won't start anymore, even when there is enough swap space available. For example: I have Opera and the mail client runing and want to launch a third app. I see a high cpu load

Re: [maemo-users] Re: [maemo-developers] Canola: other apps won't start

2006-12-06 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 6 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Everything has a price, and to be able to give users the experience that we planned of course we will need more resources than the usual. Sure, I wasn't complaining, just stating my experience. But even with that said, we worked hard this week to

Re: [maemo-developers] D-BUS question

2006-07-14 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 14 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i want to make an application running on a normal desktop computer to communicate with maemo. Has anyone done something similar, are there any sources, tutorial available that could help me? The choice of protocol depends on what you are communicating,

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-04-03 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 31 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30 Mar 2006 13:05:41 -0500, Ted Zlatanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cebit-web-site-shows-origami-ui/ Looks horribly painful to use, just take your keyboard in your hand like that and try to move you thumb in an arc

shaped X windows on the 770 (was: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device)

2006-04-03 Thread Ted Zlatanov
Thanks for the Python pointers. I'm good with Perl, but Python should be manageable. The question I had was: does the 770 support shaped X windows, or can they only be rectangular? If yes, can they be done without C/C++? Ted ___ maemo-developers

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:58 -0500, Ted Zlatanov wrote: - Origami-style keyboard (radial from a corner, probably better under Fitt's law) - see the billion preview pics for a sample Fitt's law only applies for mice, and the Origami keyboard appears

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, disq's law: As an online discussion about maemo grows longer, the probability of a comparison/statement involving Origami approaches one. (Greetings go to Mike Godwin for Godwin's Law) I have to point out, I made neither a comparison nor a

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: neat device

2006-03-30 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 30 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Almost as funny as the fact that the device is referenced as an origin for good ideas when AFAIK nobody has even seen such a thing live not to mention holding one ;) I am not sure how that's relevant. I went by this picture, which could be a mock-up