Hi Andrew
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:23PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
From a technical PoV, IT 2005 and IT 2006 have been completely
different, though: lots of minor releases to fix bugs in the former;
nothing like that with the latter - but there's Sardine instead.
That's a very good point:
On 10/26/06, Mikhail Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:23PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
From a technical PoV, IT 2005 and IT 2006 have been completely
different, though: lots of minor releases to fix bugs in the former;
nothing like that with the latter - but
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:20:02PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 10/26/06, Mikhail Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:44:23PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
From a technical PoV, IT 2005 and IT 2006 have been completely
different, though: lots of minor releases to fix
On 10/26/06, Mikhail Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip interesting points about bugfix releases]
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:20:02PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
[snip the rest, I think we can probably put that safely to bed]
Pity. :-/
Well, if you insist: IMHO, I think the people
Hi,
this is embarrassing: there is a buffer overflow in the Application
Manager that is triggered when dealing with package icons that are
larger than 2048 bytes after base64 decoding.
The overflow happens when there is a repository in
/etc/apt/sources.list that contains such a icon in one of
On 10/25/06, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is embarrassing: there is a buffer overflow in the Application
Manager that is triggered when dealing with package icons that are
larger than 2048 bytes after base64 decoding.
Oops. Thanks for the disclosure.
The bug is present in
Ola,
This now brings the question of an end-user roadmap back to the fore
with a vengenance. To put it bluntly, how long is Nokia going to leave
end users vulnerable to possible attacks? When *is* the next maintenance
release of IT 2006?
maybe its more helpful to ask if there is anything we
On 10/25/06, David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
You know, IMO (not official Nokia policy) this isn't exactly a high risk
security issue. To exploit, you need to install a package from an
external, non-trusted source. Once you start installing non-trusted 3rd
party
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 16:30 +0100, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 10/25/06, David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
You know, IMO (not official Nokia policy) this isn't exactly a high risk
security issue. To exploit, you need to install a package from an
external, non-trusted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Weinehall schreef:
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 16:24 +0100, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 10/25/06, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe its more helpful to ask if there is anything we (the community) can
do to help get it out of the door?? ...
That
On 10/25/06, David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 16:24 +0100, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 10/25/06, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe its more helpful to ask if there is anything we (the community)
can do to help get it out of the door?? ...
That presupposes
ext David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 16:24 +0100, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 10/25/06, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe its more helpful to ask if there is anything we (the community) can
do to help get it out of the door?? ...
That presupposes there
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 17:44 +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Weinehall schreef:
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 16:24 +0100, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 10/25/06, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe its more helpful to ask if there is anything we (the
On Wed, 2006-25-10 at 18:57 +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
Most of the quirks have been twisted out now;
it's almost functional, and our legal department is checking it at the
moment.
This has got to be the saddest statement of our society, the fact that
the legal department has to check on it.
On Wed, 2006-25-10 at 19:54 +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
On ons, 2006-10-25 at 09:39 -0700, ext George Farris wrote:
On Wed, 2006-25-10 at 18:57 +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
Most of the quirks have been twisted out now;
it's almost functional, and our legal department is checking it at
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:49:09PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
If Nokia's plans now solely consist of yearly releases (with no word as to
whether or not they cost money), the community'll probably want to start
thinking about forking whatever's present so that we're not dependent on
occasional,
Ola,
Either way, some professionalism would be nice.
It's certainly a matter of definition :) Please do define it and we'll
see if it's possible to follow your definition...
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional
A professional provides a service in exchange for payment in accordance
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:43:34PM -0500, Ian wrote:
Either way, some professionalism would be nice.
It's certainly a matter of definition :) Please do define it and we'll
see if it's possible to follow your definition...
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional
A professional
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:49:09PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
If Nokia's plans now solely consist of yearly releases (with no word as to
whether or not they cost money), the community'll probably want to start
thinking about forking
19 matches
Mail list logo
