Michael Wiktowy wrote:
IANAL but it is my understanding that most countries have RFI laws
that do not allow RF chip manufacturers to allow their users to modify
their chips to switch to licensed bands or use an amount of power that
brings it into a licenseable realm. It is not just the case
ext Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:50:47PM +0100, Hugh Warrington wrote:
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 8/29/06, Devesh Kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Christian Pernegger wrote:
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
Could you please send me why ?
-
On 8/31/06, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More likely manufacturers feel that there is valuable IP in their blobsand would prefer not to give it around to everyone for free, especiallyin a highly competitive market like wlan chipsets are.
I suspect that that is the case with the video
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 11:47 -0400, John B. Holmblad wrote:
Andrew,
regarding your comment on support for Kimset I would add that with the
proliferation of so-called Municipal WIFI networks here in the U.S.,
it behooves Nokia to make the M770 attractive/useful not only to
software developers
2006/8/30, Andrew Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 11:47 -0400, John B. Holmblad wrote:
Andrew,
regarding your comment on support for Kimset I would add that with the
proliferation of so-called Municipal WIFI networks here in the U.S.,
it behooves Nokia to make the M770
On 8/30/06, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/8/30, Andrew Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Forgive me if I'm ignorant, but do you mean this one:
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/cx3110x/It would be good if that page was really alive.-Paulo Pires
___
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 19:47 +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
Forgive me if I'm ignorant, but do you mean this one:
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/cx3110x/
License: GNU General Public License (GPL) doesn't sound too binary,
even though GPL tends to be a bit black-and-white in it's license
2006/8/30, Andrew Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 19:47 +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
Forgive me if I'm ignorant, but do you mean this one:
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/cx3110x/
License: GNU General Public License (GPL) doesn't sound too binary,
even though GPL tends to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kalle Vahlman schreef:
Hmm, I've always been under the impression that any kind of
combination of binary-only and GPL code would be in violation... IANAL
of course.
Slightly a different issue, but a nice read anyway:
On 8/30/06, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Kalle Vahlman schreef: Hmm, I've always been under the impression that any kind of combination of binary-only and GPL code would be in violation... IANAL
of course.Slightly a different issue, but a nice
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 15:56 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think the waters are all that clear in this
situation.
No, unfortunately they're not.
IANAL but it is my understanding that most countries have RFI laws
that do not allow RF chip manufacturers to allow their
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 22:56 +0200, ext Christian Pernegger wrote:
I am just telling some truths that others should know.
I'm with you insofar as
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
[zap]
A lot of people, me included, don't have a clue
about cross-compiling or embedded
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 01:00 +0200, ext Hartmut Henkel wrote:
Just to add here: i have one of these Nokias with the broken LCD
(vertical stripes). Actually i don't even believe that the LCD is
broken, it looks like a wrong setting of the LCD (with the old HP pocket
calculators you could tweak
On Aug 29, 2006, at 12:22, Kuosmanen Tuomas (Nokia-M/Helsinki) wrote:
The fact that the
environment uses its own gtk (while a lot of stuff is being pushed
upstream) - this forces you to use a chroot environment. While
scratchbox does a lot of things for you to make things less nasty,
it's
a
ext Christian Pernegger wrote:
I am just telling some truths that others should know.
I'm with you insofar as
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
Could you please send me why ?
- Setting up ScratchBox ???
- Downloading, extracting maemo x.x rootstrap ?
- Setting up UI
On 8/29/06, Devesh Kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Christian Pernegger wrote:
I am just telling some truths that others should know.
I'm with you insofar as
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
Could you please send me why ?
- Setting up ScratchBox ???
- Downloading,
ext Andrew Barr wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 18:47 -0300, Alessandro Ikeuchi wrote:
...
While I certainly don't agree with the angry tone used, I have to say
Maemo and the Nokia 770 have been disappointing in terms of openness. It
seems to me that Nokia has opened just enough to get apps
Title: Best Regards,
Devesh,
the following commentary from Andrew is somewhat disconcerting since it
suggests that Nokia is somehow holding back on openness:
"I have to say
Maemo and the Nokia 770 have been disappointing in terms of openness"
Assuming that his disappointment is
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 8/29/06, Devesh Kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Christian Pernegger wrote:
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
Could you please send me why ?
- Setting up ScratchBox ???
- Downloading, extracting maemo x.x rootstrap ?
- Setting up UI environment
Why was [setting up the developent environment difficult]?
scratchbox is not an official Debian package, and as far as the rather
intrusive directory structure goes, I can see why it isn't. It also
needs i386 when my do your worst boxes are both amd64. All in all it
was just long and
On 8/29/06, Hugh Warrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Flegg wrote:
[Getting scratchbox running]
It was just a long and labourious process. The `installer' script
made it trivial the second time I did it, so much so I wonder why
this isn't advertised more as a recommended and
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:50:47PM +0100, Hugh Warrington wrote:
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 8/29/06, Devesh Kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Christian Pernegger wrote:
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
Could you please send me why ?
- Setting up ScratchBox ???
-
On 8/29/06, Devesh Kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now what we are concentrating on, beside improving the above is to
enable participation and contribution in stages to different parts of
maemo, starting with HAF/Sardine which I hope would extend. The starting
up and adoption barrier for
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:16:15 -0400
Andrew Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/29/06, Devesh Kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
(Just a personal gripe of mine: Proper monitor mode support in the
WLAN driver so Kismet will run correctly.
... and packet injection support for aireplay ;)
There is http://garage.maemo.org/projects/cx3110x/ for this particular case. But, unfortunately, nobody is answering in its forums and not even in this ML.Paulo Pires
On 8/29/06, Jaime Ruiz Frontera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:16:15 -0400Andrew Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 20:10 +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
Alessandro Ikeuchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
gtk_text_buffer_insert_at_cursor(mybuffer, \u00E3, -1);
gtk_text_buffer_insert_at_cursor () expects UTF-8 as the second
argument. I don't know what C99 / C++ define for the \u excape
Nice??? I would never criticize someone that I don´t know... I am just telling
some truths that others should know.
I am pissed off with Nokia 770...Hildon is pure trash, that´s it... I see
everyday in the list, only more bugs and flaws... Don´t you agree?
Where are Hildon developers? Where are
I am just telling some truths that others should know.
I'm with you insofar as
- setting up the developent environment was a bitch
- it still doesn't give you the same environment as a real 770 apparently
- C++ plus custom framework doesn't exactly lend itself to RAD, maybe
a scripting language
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Pernegger
Sent: segunda-feira, 28 de agosto de 2006 17:56
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Cc: Shae Matijs Erisson
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] RE: Nokia 770 sources...
I am just telling some truths that others should know
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 18:47 -0300, Alessandro Ikeuchi wrote:
...
While I certainly don't agree with the angry tone used, I have to say
Maemo and the Nokia 770 have been disappointing in terms of openness. It
seems to me that Nokia has opened just enough to get apps ported and/or
written for the
On Mon, 2006-28-08 at 18:40 -0400, Andrew Barr wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 18:47 -0300, Alessandro Ikeuchi wrote:
...
While I certainly don't agree with the angry tone used, I have to say
Maemo and the Nokia 770 have been disappointing in terms of openness. It
seems to me that Nokia has
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Andrew Barr wrote:
This is unfortunate, because it creates a burden on the Nokia
employees working on this project. They are the only ones who can add
many requested features or fix bugs, so in many cases people complain
to the mail list because they cannot take care of
32 matches
Mail list logo
