Is there some specific reason why instructions tell to select
CPU-transparency in the devkits when creating a i386 target? I think
that shouldn't be needed, but it should cause any problems
either since
no CPU-transparency method is selected.
No. It really should not be needed.
Hi Klassjan,
On 11/30/06, *Carlos Guerreiro* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Hildon Application Framework that is being polished in Herring
will
be used in the next major 3.0 release of Maemo which will be
called Bora.
By porting your application to
On 11/30/06, Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Klassjan,
Since you state applications have to be ported to Maemo 3, will
Maemo 3 be backward compatible with Maemo 2.x applications?
[snip]
We are working on documenting the changes and on a porting guide. Stay
tuned.
How far off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Flegg schreef:
On 11/30/06, Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Klassjan,
Since you state applications have to be ported to Maemo 3, will
Maemo 3 be backward compatible with Maemo 2.x applications?
[snip]
We are working on
Andrew Flegg schreef:
On 11/30/06, Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Klassjan,
Since you state applications have to be ported to Maemo 3, will
Maemo 3 be backward compatible with Maemo 2.x applications?
[snip]
We are working on documenting the changes and on a porting guide.
On 11/30/06, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Flegg schreef:
How far off is Bora? If it's next week, there's little point in
continuing to port existing applications; if it's 6 months, then I'll
carry on :-)
You mean like the 'Roadmap' we both have been asking for in the past?
I
ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 11/30/06, Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Klassjan,
Since you state applications have to be ported to Maemo 3, will
Maemo 3 be backward compatible with Maemo 2.x applications?
[snip]
We are working on documenting the changes and on a porting guide.
On tor, 2006-11-30 at 10:36 +, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
[snip]
If Maemo is to be an open and community participated effort, rather
than just an open source Nokia SDK[1], the leaders of the project
(i.e. Nokia) need to start informing the community of their plans for
the platform.
When
On 11/30/06, Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
How far off is Bora? If it's next week, there's little point in
continuing to port existing applications; if it's 6 months, then I'll
carry on :-)
Something in between. Unfortunately I cannot reveal the target
On 11/30/06, David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On tor, 2006-11-30 at 10:36 +, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
[snip]
If Maemo is to be an open and community participated effort, rather
than just an open source Nokia SDK[1], the leaders of the project
(i.e. Nokia) need to start informing
ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 11/30/06, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Flegg schreef:
How far off is Bora? If it's next week, there's little point in
continuing to port existing applications; if it's 6 months, then I'll
carry on :-)
You mean like the 'Roadmap' we both have been
I think it's natural that, at first, the platform and the products that
use it will be tightly bound. When the platform and products are more
mature, it'll be easier to separate their schedules.
But as long as they are bound, we can't expect companies to indirectly
announce their product release
On tor, 2006-11-30 at 10:53 +, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 11/30/06, David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On tor, 2006-11-30 at 10:36 +, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
[snip]
If Maemo is to be an open and community participated effort, rather
than just an open source Nokia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[I'm subscribed to this list, so quit with the reply-all nonsense]
Carlos Guerreiro schreef:
Officially Maemo is still that, an application development platform with
SDKs, but we
are experimenting with community development and eventually Maemo
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:57:50PM +0100, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
[I'm subscribed to this list, so quit with the reply-all nonsense]
http://www.google.com/search?q=mail-followup-to
Carlos Guerreiro schreef:
Officially Maemo is still that, an application development platform with
SDKs, but we
On 11/30/06, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David's mail is pretty good. Carlos is obviously doing his best, so all
I can do is suggest to you that maybe doing your best to irritate the
people trying to help you despite a large corporate structure that has
never attempted this sort of
On tor, 2006-11-30 at 13:05 +, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 11/30/06, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David's mail is pretty good. Carlos is obviously doing his best, so all
I can do is suggest to you that maybe doing your best to irritate the
people trying to help you despite a
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 01:30 +0200, Carlos Guerreiro wrote:
Hi,
Like Sardine, Herring is meant for application developers, hackers and
tinkerers, not for end-users.
To taste it, follow the step by step instructions in
http://maemo.org/maemowiki/SardineGettingStarted replacing 'sardine'
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 15:35 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
Well, the amount of people working on this project isn't exactly
staggering. Each day we face the choice - spend a few hours on
reading
the maemo-developers list and answering to questions about our
schedule,
thereby delaying future
Hi,
A bit over 4 months ago the Maemo project released Sardine, a fresh and
tasty bleeding edge distribution of the Hildon Application Framework for
the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet.
Sardine contains the latest versions of HAF components and some key
dependencies.
Have you wanted to get a
20 matches
Mail list logo
