ext Neal H. Walfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What florian wants is `apt-get upgrade' functionality, i.e. install
updates for any installed package.
Yep, and the Application installer does not give you that at the
moment, unfortunately.
We were dodging all the system upgrade issues when
ext Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd say now is a good time to start experimenting. I would be happy
to add some hacks to the osso-application-installer in sardine...
Ok, I am going to do the following (in the next days or so): the
Check for updates view will include a fake entry
ext Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd say now is a good time to start experimenting. I would be happy
to add some hacks to the osso-application-installer in sardine...
Ok, I am going to do the following (in the next days or so): the
Check for updates view will include a fake
Carlos Guerreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have a good solution for handling packages that cannot be
upgraded while the HAF is running?
Yes, those packages should be fixed! :-)
I had a chat with Guillem some time ago. I got the picture that
making maemo-launcher upgradeable without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Neumaier schreef:
I suppose you read this: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ on how to
build proper debian archives.
But for that lib problem:
it can't be too hard to write a control file like this:
snip
Build-Depends:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Koen Kooi schrieb:
Cute, but the real problem is something different:
Day 1:
Florian uploads gpe-calendar 0.99-12 + libeventdb1 0.36-17
Day 2:
Neal fixes bug in gpe-calendar, florian upload 0.99-13
Koen uses the AI, gets the updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Neumaier schreef:
What was the section before? just lib? Afaik a section user/lib isn't
available in debian :)
Neither are packages for armel ;)
regards,
Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Hello,
how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the application
manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating gpe-calendar the
updated libeventdb does not get installed. libeventdb is visible because its
section currently is user/libs, so in this case i can
At Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:06:31 +0100,
Tomas Frydrych wrote:
how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the
application manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating
gpe-calendar the updated libeventdb does not get installed. libeventdb
is visible because its
Hi,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
At Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:06:31 +0100,
Tomas Frydrych wrote:
how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the
application manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating
gpe-calendar the updated libeventdb does not get installed.
I suppose you read this: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ on how to
build proper debian archives.
But for that lib problem:
it can't be too hard to write a control file like this:
snip
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev ( = 1.0.0-1), bar (= 1.0.0)
/snip
This will pull libfoo in a package version
11 matches
Mail list logo
