Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-06 Thread Sarah Newman
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I wanted to ask a question about the already upstreamed stuff. Is it maintained in the linus tree? I mean, I guess the development is made in Nokia tree (which is not public, sadly), but once the first upstreaming is done, are the updates pushed regularly or is the

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-05 Thread Quim Gil
Denis-Courmont Remi (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: On Thursday 04 February 2010 12:53:22 ext Christopher Intemann, you wrote: Hello, I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current kernel version. I'm just curious: Where

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-05 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 04/02/2010 13:13, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: I am surely missing some pieces. Not that some of the N900-related contributions were merged upstream after the 2.6.28 kernel. Obviously, there are also some parts which haven't been merged, or not yet. I wanted to ask a question about the

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-05 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 04/02/2010 12:32, Jeff Moe wrote: At least for the N900 the answer is no. The touchscreen driver disappeared at 2.6.29: drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c I didn't found tsc2005.c in 2.6.28:

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-05 Thread Jeff Moe
On Friday 05 February 2010 02:46:21 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On 04/02/2010 12:32, Jeff Moe wrote: At least for the N900 the answer is no. The touchscreen driver disappeared at 2.6.29: drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c I didn't found tsc2005.c in 2.6.28:

Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Christopher Intemann
Hello, I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current kernel version. I'm just curious: Where does Nokia/ Maemo stand? Are there Maemo sources in the official Linux kernel tree at all? Regards, Christopher [1]

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Igor Stoppa
Hi, ext Christopher Intemann wrote: Hello, I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current kernel version. I'm just curious: Where does Nokia/ Maemo stand? Are there Maemo sources in the official Linux kernel tree at all?

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia czwartek, 4 lutego 2010 o 11:53:22 Christopher Intemann napisał(a): I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current kernel version. I'm just curious: Where does Nokia/ Maemo stand? Are there Maemo sources in the

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Jeff Moe
On Thursday 04 February 2010 04:23:59 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Dnia czwartek, 4 lutego 2010 o 11:53:22 Christopher Intemann napisał(a): I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current kernel version. I'm just curious:

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Thursday 04 February 2010 12:53:22 ext Christopher Intemann, you wrote: Hello, I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current kernel version. I'm just curious: Where does Nokia/ Maemo stand? Are there Maemo sources

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 04/02/2010 12:32, Jeff Moe wrote: On Thursday 04 February 2010 04:23:59 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Dnia czwartek, 4 lutego 2010 o 11:53:22 Christopher Intemann napisał(a): I came across this blog-entry [1] which is describing why the Android kernel extensions were removed from the current

Re: Maemo code in Linux kernel?

2010-02-04 Thread Jeff Moe
On Thursday 04 February 2010 06:13:07 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On 04/02/2010 12:32, Jeff Moe wrote: On Thursday 04 February 2010 04:23:59 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Dnia czwartek, 4 lutego 2010 o 11:53:22 Christopher Intemann napisał(a): I came across this blog-entry [1] which is