Hi,
The number of issues being caused by the deployment of PR1.2 SDK to
the fremantle autobuilder is becoming critical. It doesn't even matter
when PR1.2 is released, as we should have a way of dealing with this
in-place for the next upgrade.
BACKGROUND
~~
After the PR1.2 SDK was
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:55:51 +0100
Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
Hi,
The number of issues being caused by the deployment of PR1.2 SDK to
the fremantle autobuilder is becoming critical. It doesn't even matter
when PR1.2 is released, as we should have a way of dealing with this
in-place
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:13, Bryan Jacobs n...@landwarsin.asia wrote:
It seems to me that the real problem is actually the difficulty in
implementing #4 above. If there were magically separate infrastructure
for each incompatible release, there would be no issue - a developer
uploads their
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:41:48 +0100
Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:13, Bryan Jacobs n...@landwarsin.asia wrote:
It seems to me that the real problem is actually the difficulty in
implementing #4 above. If there were magically separate
infrastructure for each
Andrew Flegg wrote:
Hi,
The number of issues being caused by the deployment of PR1.2 SDK to the
fremantle autobuilder is becoming critical. It doesn't even matter when
PR1.2 is released, as we should have a way of dealing with this in-place
for the next upgrade.
I've copied the contents
On Wed, April 7, 2010 16:41, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:13, Bryan Jacobs n...@landwarsin.asia wrote:
It seems to me that the real problem is actually the difficulty in
implementing #4 above. If there were magically separate infrastructure
for each incompatible release,
Subject: Re: PR1.2 SDK for Extras-devel: how to solve?
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:13, Bryan Jacobs n...@landwarsin.asia wrote:
It seems to me that the real problem is actually the difficulty in
implementing #4 above. If there were magically separate infrastructure
for each incompatible release
2010/4/7 Ram Kurvakat rkma...@gmx.com:
The idea is to give a choice to the developer to choose which SDK the
autobuilder needs to use and to which repo the app needs to go to.
Providing an option in the debian control file to build against the user
specified SDK since the developer knows
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 16:54:28 Niels Breet wrote:
On Wed, April 7, 2010 16:41, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:13, Bryan Jacobs n...@landwarsin.asia wrote:
It seems to me that the real problem is actually the difficulty in
implementing #4 above. If there were magically
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:27:30 +0100
Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net wrote:
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 16:54:28 Niels Breet wrote:
On Wed, April 7, 2010 16:41, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:13, Bryan Jacobs n...@landwarsin.asia
wrote:
It seems to me that the real problem is
10 matches
Mail list logo
