Re: docs and optification

2009-12-18 Thread Thomas Perl
2009/12/13 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs: On Sunday 13 December 2009 15:13:54 Mustali Dalal wrote: Purging copyright files does not seem right; they are tiny and have legal bearing. Since a lot, if not all, apps currently in testing use GPL or other FOSS license, I would guess there be good

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-13 Thread Mustali Dalal
Purging copyright files does not seem right; they are tiny and have legal bearing. Since a lot, if not all, apps currently in testing use GPL or other FOSS license, I would guess there be good reasons to keep the copyright file installed with the package. Would there be license violation if a

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-13 Thread Attila Csipa
On Sunday 13 December 2009 15:13:54 Mustali Dalal wrote: Purging copyright files does not seem right; they are tiny and have legal bearing. Since a lot, if not all, apps currently in testing use GPL or other FOSS license, I would guess there be good reasons to keep the copyright file

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-13 Thread Josef Assad
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 03:37:17PM +0100, Attila Csipa wrote: On Sunday 13 December 2009 15:13:54 Mustali Dalal wrote: Purging copyright files does not seem right; they are tiny and have legal bearing. Since a lot, if not all, apps currently in testing use GPL or other FOSS license, I

docs and optification

2009-12-12 Thread Josef Assad
I was just sitting sifting through extras-testing. While verifying optification of apps therein, I saw that some apps were chucking the docs/appname/ off of /usr/share/ and some were optifying that bit. Which is preferable? -- import sig ___

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-12 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:33, Josef Assad j...@donassad.com wrote: I was just sitting sifting through extras-testing. While verifying optification of apps therein, I saw that some apps were chucking the docs/appname/ off of /usr/share/ and some were optifying that bit. Which is preferable?

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-12 Thread Josef Assad
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:37:42AM +, Andrew Flegg wrote: On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:33, Josef Assad j...@donassad.com wrote: I was just sitting sifting through extras-testing. While verifying optification of apps therein, I saw that some apps were chucking the docs/appname/ off of

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-12 Thread Mustali
The copyright and other files in themdoc folder get purged by docpurge. If copyright files are required, the doc folder should be optified. I am assuming docpurge does not purge the docs folder in /opt. - Original message - On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:37:42AM +, Andrew Flegg wrote:

Re: docs and optification

2009-12-12 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Samstag, den 12.12.2009, 14:06 +0100 schrieb Mustali: I am assuming docpurge does not purge the docs folder in /opt. See https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5725 - not yet, but will be in a future public version. andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster)