Hi,
ext Attila Csipa wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 17:35:34 you wrote:
There are some potential downsides for just suspending processes
completely. Most of the processes have subscribed to several
different D-BUS messages, X events etc.
For example D-BUS will infinitely buffer messages
On Monday 20 September 2010 17:35:34 you wrote:
There are some potential downsides for just suspending processes
completely. Most of the processes have subscribed to several
different D-BUS messages, X events etc.
For example D-BUS will infinitely buffer messages that are sent
to a
2010/9/20 Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com:
I don't think real applications out there have a habit of
unsubscribing from dbus signals when they don't need them either.
Yes, that's what listening for D-Bus signals is all about most of the
time (getting notified when something of interest
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.netwrote:
Anyway: this was pretty much in keeping with my idea: move it into the task
switcher (hildon-desktop/other) so that applications which are moved to
background are stopped (unless they signal for whatever reason that
Hi,
ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:58, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.net wrote:
Anyway: this was pretty much in keeping with my idea: move it into the task
switcher (hildon-desktop/other) so that applications which are moved to
background are stopped (unless they signal
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Eero Tamminen eero.tammi...@nokia.com wrote:
For example D-BUS will infinitely buffer messages that are sent
to a connected client but not read by it. If these messages can
be very frequent (say device orientation network condition messages),
this will soon
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:58, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.net
wrote:
Anyway: this was pretty much in keeping with my idea: move it into
the task switcher (hildon-desktop/other) so that applications which
are moved to background are
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Perhaps this would be even more useful to keep multitasking memory
usage at bay - by suspending the processes not in foreground (by their
own volition of course)?
... one more thought:
It would be more useful if it
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:58, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.net wrote:
Anyway: this was pretty much in keeping with my idea: move it into the task
switcher (hildon-desktop/other) so that applications which are moved to
background are stopped (unless they signal for whatever reason that
- Original message -
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:58, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.net
wrote:
Anyway: this was pretty much in keeping with my idea: move it into the
task switcher (hildon-desktop/other) so that applications which are
moved to background are stopped (unless they
It has been difficult for many developers to comply with many of the
recommended
power-saving practices for Maemo, especially those porting apps from desktop
environments. I'm not sure how many of you noticed already, but in the best
hack-tradition of the N900 mikkov made a suspendprocess
11 matches
Mail list logo
