Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. a écrit :
Perhaps we should follow the approach other distributions seem to use.
Official Mageia repos:
Core: The core Mageia distribution (IMHO, should contain only a very minimal
instalation (No GUI or Productivity software).
Desktop: GUI and Productivity software.
Just some smallish notes regarding other distros..
On 10.12.2010 12:22, andre999 wrote:
Debian uses the same names main, contrib, non-free, with explicit policy
close to Mandriva practices.
In the same policy page, they say that patent-contrained software goes
into non-free, then further down
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 17:04, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/12/10 Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com:
Let's try this: what if we consider, at first, that software patents
were a non-issue? (that is, we just consider they are all invalid as
such).
From a mirror
2010/12/10 Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com:
Ok, but you still take into account SP in your answer. :-p (we would
have come to that, but the idea was to think about it from a naïve,
software-patent-free perspective).
If there were no software patents anywhere what would be the issue of
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 19:14, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/12/10 Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com:
Ok, but you still take into account SP in your answer. :-p (we would
have come to that, but the idea was to think about it from a naïve,
software-patent-free
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2010/12/10 Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com:
Ok, but you still take into account SP in your answer. :-p (we would
have come to that, but the idea was to think about it from a naïve,
software-patent-free perspective).
If there were no
Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 16:35, Wolfgang Bornathmolc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Isn't this what this whole discussion is about? There ARE legal issues
with some software users regard as must have. Now, how do you avoid
these issues?
To summarize, strategies:
1.
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2010/12/10 Romain d'Alvernyrdalve...@gmail.com:
Ok, but you still take into account SP in your answer. :-p (we would
have come to that, but the idea was to think about it from a naïve,
software-patent-free perspective).
