On 4 July 2011 08:25, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
Name : logrotate Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.8.0 Vendor: Mageia.Org
Release : 1.mga2 Build Date: Mon Jul 4 08:24:04
2011
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 4 July 2011 08:25, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
Name : logrotate Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.8.0 Vendor: Mageia.Org
Release : 1.mga2
I updated xcb-util and stupidly obsoleted the old libs (which have
been merged in the one lib), this broke the BS.
First thing to do is rebuild startup-notification, but it fails, and I
don't see why
On 6 July 2011 11:29, nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 4 July 2011 08:25, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
Name : logrotate Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.8.0
Am 17.03.2011 09:14, schrieb Samuel Verschelde:
Le mardi 15 mars 2011 21:30:05, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le mardi 15 mars 2011 à 20:34 +0100, Tux99 a écrit :
Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Tue, 15 March 2011 20:21
Because some people do not care about patents and using tainted stuff,
but
The problem is libxcb is obsoleting libxcb-util0:
$ rpm -qp --obsoletes libxcb-dpms0-1.7-1.mga1.i586.rpm
libxcb-util0
libxcb-util1
2011/7/6 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
I updated xcb-util and stupidly obsoleted the old libs (which have
been merged in the one lib), this broke the BS.
On 6 July 2011 12:04, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 12:00, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is libxcb is obsoleting libxcb-util0:
$ rpm -qp --obsoletes libxcb-dpms0-1.7-1.mga1.i586.rpm
libxcb-util0
libxcb-util1
So we need to bump the Epoch in
2011/7/6 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2011 12:00, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is libxcb is obsoleting libxcb-util0:
$ rpm -qp --obsoletes libxcb-dpms0-1.7-1.mga1.i586.rpm
libxcb-util0
libxcb-util1
So we need to bump the Epoch in xcb-util?
No, we
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
1. All non-free goes into non-free
2. Software which may be illegal in some countries (mostly because of
licensing) will go into tainted.
That's all. Clear and simple.
The
On 6 July 2011 12:08, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/6 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2011 12:00, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is libxcb is obsoleting libxcb-util0:
$ rpm -qp --obsoletes libxcb-dpms0-1.7-1.mga1.i586.rpm
libxcb-util0
2011/7/5 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU beranger...@yahoo.ca:
fwang,
mikala,
# urpmi kdegraphics4-devel
The following package has to be removed for others to be upgraded:
ksnapshot-4.6.90-1.mga2.i586
(due to conflicts with kdegraphics4-devel[= 2:4.6.90]) (y/N)
The conflicts against
2011/7/6 John Balcaen mik...@mageia.org:
Fwang i can understand that you want to keep an empty metapackage
(even if i'm personnaly not agree as said earlier) for kdegraphics,
but why adding a -devel metapackage here j ?
I also noticed you did the same things for kdeedu so i'll remove it
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 18:28:27 Funda Wang wrote:
2011/7/6 John Balcaen mik...@mageia.org:
Fwang i can understand that you want to keep an empty metapackage
(even if i'm personnaly not agree as said earlier) for kdegraphics,
but why adding a -devel metapackage here j ?
I also
obsoletes are not the correct place for solve such problems.
ksnapshot don't have any obsoletes but a conflict (which is probably
indeed too much but was not expected to add any problem i
Sorry to bother you, but since this is both about an upgrade and a change of
package names (albeit via
Am 06.07.2011 12:10, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
1. All non-free goes into non-free
2. Software which may be illegal in some countries (mostly because of
licensing) will go
On 6 July 2011 13:40, Florian Hubold doktor5...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 06.07.2011 12:10, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
1. All non-free goes into non-free
2. Software which may
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
1. All non-free goes into non-free
2. Software which may be illegal in some countries (mostly
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
1. All non-free goes into
Am 06.07.2011 14:04, schrieb Ahmad Samir:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alvernyrdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornathmolc...@googlemail.com wrote:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 14:04, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages
On 06/07/11 12:58, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornathmolc...@googlemail.com wrote:
If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
1. All non-free goes into non-free
2. Software
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
The reason why we have tainted is, that there are patents, which restrain
some user to use this software. So, it's a question of legality, which
should get the higher priority. The differentiation if it's free or
not-free is only a question of
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 05/07/11 10:50 did gyre and gimble:
I see packages like gstreamer0.10-soup installed as separate packages.
Is there any real gain from this split? Other than pulling in other
libraries etc, as it just causes potential problems for some packages
that do not
On 6 July 2011 14:27, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 14:04, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
If we go
Hi there
Here is an interesting topic :).Texlive is one of the biggest package
we have for now. Of course split is needed but we postponed it after
Mageia 1 to have a look on it. Now here we go!
It needs first to have a look on the way we want to split it, Fedora
one (zillions of sub-packages)
在 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:09:30 +0800, Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org寫道:
Hi there
Here is an interesting topic :).Texlive is one of the biggest package
we have for now. Of course split is needed but we postponed it after
Mageia 1 to have a look on it. Now here we go!
It needs first to have a look
On 6 July 2011 15:09, Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Yeah it is a bit of a grab-bag of stuff, but again, should we still just
bundle everything together anyway and sod the extra disk space needed?
It would be a lot simpler for users
Hi there
Here are the topics for tonight's meeting at 19h UTC on #mageia-dev
- release cycle, backports policies
- starting implementing specifications for Mageia2
- review of mentoring (andre555)
- review of secteam (stewb)
- support of Mageia 1
Cheers
--
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Kira wrote:
在 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:09:30 +0800, Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org寫道:
Hi there
Here is an interesting topic :).Texlive is one of the biggest package
we have for now. Of course split is needed but we postponed it after
Mageia 1 to have a look on it. Now here we
2011/7/6 Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Kira wrote:
在 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:09:30 +0800, Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org寫道:
Hi there
Here is an interesting topic :).Texlive is one of the biggest package
we have for now. Of course split is needed but we
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 15:04, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 14:27, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand this as: software that might be free or open source =
can be not free or open source. might expressed the possibility, not
the requirement.
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 15:30:30, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
Here are the topics for tonight's meeting at 19h UTC on #mageia-dev
- release cycle, backports policies
- starting implementing specifications for Mageia2
- review of mentoring (andre555)
- review of secteam (stewb)
-
2011/7/6 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2011 14:27, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 14:04, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang
Hello,
A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on
i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) :
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1892
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1939
2011/7/6 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org:
Hello,
A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on
i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) :
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
Successfully tested on Mageia 1 x86_64
(reported also in the bug report)
--
wobo
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit :
Hello,
A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on
i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) :
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
Op dinsdag 05 juli 2011 01:15:52 schreef Eugeni Dodonov:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 16:57, Maarten Vanraes
maarten.vanr...@gmail.comwrote:
Op maandag 04 juli 2011 20:31:41 schreef Dexter Morgan:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maarten Vanraes
maarten.vanr...@gmail.com wrote:
But
Op woensdag 06 juli 2011 14:44:07 schreef Michael scherer:
Hi
So after reading all the feedback on the topic of release, here
are the conclusion of the discussion made by Anne and me :
[...]
thanks for the good work!
2011/7/6 Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com:
On 6 July 2011 15:09, Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Yeah it is a bit of a grab-bag of stuff, but again, should we still just
bundle everything together anyway and sod the extra disk
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 19:59:18 Mageia Team wrote:
Name: gnome-control-center Relocations: (not relocatable)
[...].
cjw cjw 3.1.3-1.mga2:
+ Revision: 118992
- 3.1.3
There's a file conflicts with gnome-color-manager :
file /usr/lib64/control-center-1/panels/libcolor.so from
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 10:45:16 Mageia Team wrote:
Name: gnome-settings-daemonRelocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.1.3 Vendor: Mageia.Org
Release : 1.mga2Build Date: Wed Jul 6 10:42:17
2011 Install Date: (not
On 06.07.2011 16:04, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 6 July 2011 14:27, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 14:04, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath
Le lundi 04 juillet 2011 à 14:12 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Hi,
In order to discuss details in a more open fashion , a meeting have been
planed for 6 juillet, in the afternoon around 13h UTC ( paris time, 15h
). We will use #mageia-meeting, and the goal is :
1) see who is interested
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:44:07 -0400, Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Since we took one month for various things ( such as discussing everything ),
we propose
the next release to be on 4th april, and start the cycle today. This is in the
middle
of the week on purpose, to avoid the weekend.
Can we get some more people testing etracer please?
As per https://bugs.mageia.org/attachment.cgi?id=616 there is a
problem with the fonts when I run it on my Mageia 1 install.
I doesn't happen on my Cauldron install (I haven't been able to
figure out why), or for anyone else participating in
Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 06.07.2011 16:04, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 6 July 2011 14:27, Romain d'Alvernyrdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 14:04, Ahmad Samirahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alvernyrdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at
Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 6 July 2011 15:09, Christiaan Welvaartc...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Yeah it is a bit of a grab-bag of stuff, but again, should we still just
bundle everything together anyway and sod the extra disk space needed?
It would be a
2011/7/7 andre999 and...@laposte.net:
Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 06.07.2011 16:04, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 6 July 2011 14:27, Romain d'Alvernyrdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 14:04, Ahmad Samirahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain
openldap-server needs rebuild against new db51
otherwise a lot of packages want to be uninstalled
--
Thomas
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:47:49PM -0400, David W. Hodgins wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:44:07 -0400, Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Since we took one month for various things ( such as discussing everything ),
we propose
the next release to be on 4th april, and start the cycle today.
50 matches
Mail list logo
