On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:04:47AM -0500, andre999 wrote:
We have a newly qualified packager, kamil, who is already
maintaining over 160 packages. He is largely responsible for the
considerabe decrease in unmaintained packages in the last few days,
although many other packagers have
2012/1/9 Jani Välimaa jani.vali...@gmail.com:
If you need to fix a typo in previous commit, use svn propedit:
svn propedit --revprop -r release svn:log
svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages
thanks
I didn't know that
or I forgot
I think we should be in the position to be able to verify the origin of any
software we provide to users.
While we have cryptographic verification of the RPMS (both 'binary' and src),
and we store the hashes of the sources, AFAIK we do very limited verification
of any signatures provided by
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:20, Anssi Hannula an...@mageia.org wrote:
The problem is that that balance was achieved by sticking packages in
PLF/main/contrib semi-randomly. For example, H.264 decoders and MPEG-4
video encoders are in main/core, while e.g. AAC audio decoders are in
PLF/tainted.
On 01/10/2012 04:17 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:04:47AM -0500, andre999 wrote:
We have a newly qualified packager, kamil, who is already
maintaining over 160 packages. He is largely responsible for the
considerabe decrease in unmaintained packages in the last few days,
AS i understand
we are not a rolling distribution, so i dont get why i'm getting tickets to
update release.
What I mean, if you consider an update, like the one i did squid 3.1.12 to
3.1.15 please explain why. Otherwhise i gues it is better you cand use Mageia
cauldron SRPM and do backport
Hi Luis, *,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
dlu...@okay.com.mx wrote:
AS i understand
we are not a rolling distribution, so i dont get why i'm getting tickets to
update release.
What I mean, if you consider an update, like the one i did squid 3.1.12 to
3.1.15 please
Le 10/01/2012 19:12, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
And using a fixed upstream release surely is preferable over adding
patches manually, isn't it?
No. Adding bugfix-specific patches ensure you just fix specific issues,
whereas updating software version usually doesn't offer any kind of
garanty
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 11:50, Buchan Milne wrote:
I think we should be in the position to be able to verify the origin of any
software we provide to users.
I think this is a good initiative.
Does other distros do this?
Perhaps we can ask other distros to start doing the same, and thus give
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:00:35PM +0100, Johnny A. Solbu wrote:
I think this is a good initiative.
Does other distros do this?
Perhaps we can ask other distros to start doing the same, and thus give
upstream developers a reason for signing.
I believe at least some source-based distros (e.g.
The Provides most of the display manager shows dm.
This is not the case of xdm and lxdm.
Should we not add?
Op dinsdag 10 januari 2012 14:07:17 schreef Pascal Terjan:
[...]
I agree with pterjan on this
On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Buchan Milne wrote:
I think we should be in the position to be able to verify the origin of any
software we provide to users.
...
Just a reminder: a git-based build process would implicitly cover that aspect,
since the comit SHAs would be traceable back to the code
Le lundi 09 janvier 2012 à 21:08 -0500, David Walser a écrit :
Sure, I but I think Mandriva achieved a good balance between respecting
patents and not being overly paranoid.
I suppose you can't blame a US company like RedHat for being overly paranoid,
but as you said, Mandriva hasn't
Am 09.01.2012 18:28, schrieb Johnny A. Solbu:
I have been trying for the last 15 hours to install Cauldron by upgrading
from 1. I have cloned my mga1 VirtualBox install for this purpose.
I run this command: urpmi -auto --auto-select --replacefiles
For some reason it keeps loosing connection
Thanks, you know why :)
--
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le mardi 10 janvier 2012 19:12:29 Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi Luis, *,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
dlu...@okay.com.mx wrote:
AS i understand
we are not a rolling distribution, so i dont get why i'm getting tickets
to
update release.
What I mean,
On Wednesday 11 January 2012 03:28, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
I mean, stop asking updates for mageia 1 just because there is another
newversion.
May I suggest that next time, say it in so many words.
Some of us are not good at reading between the lines, and your original post
was
Le 10/01/2012 23:03, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
Thanks, you know why :)
Hé hé, this time Bruno was really fast!
Hi there,
as you might already know from previous mails or from the blog post published
yesterday, Mageia is (again) attending Fosdem this year.
http://blog.mageia.org/en/2012/01/10/happy-new-mageia-year/
Aside from participating in some discussion sessions and a talk done by misc,
we are also
On Wednesday, 11 January 2012 06:32:50 Johnny A. Solbu wrote:
On Wednesday 11 January 2012 03:28, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
I mean, stop asking updates for mageia 1 just because there is another
newversion.
May I suggest that next time, say it in so many words.
Some of us are not
21 matches
Mail list logo
