Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 05:33 +0200, Tux99 a écrit :
I thought the core build of freetype2 already has the bytecode interpreter
enabled (since the patent expired).
Why is there still a need for a tainted version?
Supixel rendering, there is a patent on it :
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 05:33 +0200, Tux99 a écrit :
I thought the core build of freetype2 already has the bytecode interpreter
enabled (since the patent expired).
Why is there still a need for a tainted version?
Supixel rendering, there is a patent on it :
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 16:31, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Supixel rendering, there is a patent on it :
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/freetype/2006-09/msg00064.html
The reference is from September 2006, almost 5 years old. There is no
indication of
freetype2 didn't get a tainted build yet; I've committed the changes
in SVN; not sure if there's still time to submit it, but ideally it
wouldn't affect the release ISO's as they'll only have the non-tainted
freetype2 build.
--
Ahmad Samir
I thought the core build of freetype2 already has the bytecode interpreter
enabled (since the patent expired).
Why is there still a need for a tainted version?
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
