On 26.11.2011 09:54, zezinho wrote:
Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 02:31:43, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
About 75% of the crash issues fixed by the above 0.7 commits affect mga1
0.6.x, with a sample size of 70 commits.
So maybe we should consider ffmpeg as Firefox : a software we must upgrade
26.11.2011 16:15, Anssi Hannula skrev:
On 26.11.2011 09:54, zezinho wrote:
Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 02:31:43, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
About 75% of the crash issues fixed by the above 0.7 commits affect mga1
0.6.x, with a sample size of 70 commits.
So maybe we should consider ffmpeg as
On 26.11.2011 16:47, Thomas Backlund wrote:
26.11.2011 16:15, Anssi Hannula skrev:
On 26.11.2011 09:54, zezinho wrote:
Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 02:31:43, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
About 75% of the crash issues fixed by the above 0.7 commits affect
mga1
0.6.x, with a sample size of 70
David W. Hodgins skrev 25.11.2011 01:21:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:53:07 -0500, D.Morgandmorga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
- update ffmpeg keeping x264 support but need to rebuild mass of
Anssi Hannula skrev 25.11.2011 01:40:
BTW, if you look at
http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/0.7
you'll notice the the security issues mentioned here are just a tip of
the iceberg, since there are hundreds of commits fixing buffer overflows
and other similar
On 25.11.2011 12:42, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Anssi Hannula skrev 25.11.2011 01:40:
BTW, if you look at
http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/0.7
you'll notice the the security issues mentioned here are just a tip of
the iceberg, since there are hundreds of
Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 02:31:43, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
About 75% of the crash issues fixed by the above 0.7 commits affect mga1
0.6.x, with a sample size of 70 commits.
So maybe we should consider ffmpeg as Firefox : a software we must upgrade
because upstream fixes security only in
Yes, new x264 introduces new libmajor, which requires a mass
rebuilding of other packages.
2011/11/24 Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net:
To Funda :
you modified the spec file of ffmpeg :
disable x264 support as x264 is too old in mageia 1
This may induce a regression (a
Funda Wang skrev 24.11.2011 14:26:
Yes, new x264 introduces new libmajor, which requires a mass
rebuilding of other packages.
Then the ffmpeg update must be fixed.
Either only backport the needed fixes,
or fix the build with current x264.
It's not allowed to push updates that
Funda Wang a écrit :
Yes, new x264 introduces new libmajor, which requires a mass
rebuilding of other packages.
2011/11/24 Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net:
To Funda :
you modified the spec file of ffmpeg :
disable x264 support as x264 is too old in mageia 1
This may
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
heavy dilemma ! heavy choice !
- let ffmpeg not updated (with x264 support but with security problem)
The proper thing is to identify the needed fixes and backport them.
- update ffmpeg disabling x264 support
not an option
- update ffmpeg keeping
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
heavy dilemma ! heavy choice !
- let ffmpeg not updated (with x264 support but with security problem)
The proper thing is to identify the needed fixes and backport them.
- update
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:53:07 -0500, D.Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
- update ffmpeg keeping x264 support but need to rebuild mass of
packages (not alone ) and provide lots
On 24.11.2011 17:53, D.Morgan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
Philippe DIDIER skrev 24.11.2011 14:52:
heavy dilemma ! heavy choice !
- let ffmpeg not updated (with x264 support but with security problem)
The proper thing is to identify the
14 matches
Mail list logo
