[Mailman-Developers] DomainKeys support

2005-08-04 Thread Nadim Shaikli
I've noticed of late that emails sent by yahoo users that get relayed by mailman end-up without the domainkey header entry [1] and thus in various yahoo users' bulk (ie. spam) folder. Is there anything that can be done to remedy this issue ? Can a site's mailman application add a locally

Re: [Mailman-Developers] How to export memberlist to file

2004-07-13 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:24:11 +0200 Nick vd Kloor @ FOR-Nation [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, not sure anymore if there is a function or parameter to get your whole memberlist in a textfile. Does anyone know? ~/bin/list_members. It would be

[Mailman-Developers] envelope header checking

2004-05-07 Thread Nadim Shaikli
I have a number of lists that I administer that seem to have come across a nasty quirk. I use postfix and spamassassin to keep spam in check but recently I've noticed something different. I disallow any posts coming in externally with @my_domain via postfix (it uses the envelope sender to do the

[Mailman-Developers] Re: Bug tracker (was - 'empty module ...)

2003-10-18 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 12:27, Marc MERLIN wrote: I just wanted to report that one of my mailman servers was also hit by this bug. All mails to the list were stopped until I applied the patch (i.e. the shunted messages weren't the problem, new test

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Log file rollovers

2003-10-14 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- Richard Barrett wrote: On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 08:20 pm, Nadim Shaikli wrote: --- Brad Knowles wrote: At 5:34 PM -0700 2003/10/09, Nadim Shaikli wrote: Nothing looked out of place to me. The file is being created correctly, I'm just surprised that mailman would even

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Log file rollovers

2003-10-13 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- Brad Knowles wrote: At 5:34 PM -0700 2003/10/09, Nadim Shaikli wrote: Nothing looked out of place to me. The file is being created correctly, I'm just surprised that mailman would even touch a non-existent as far asits concerned (mailman know not about post.1 and logrotate) unless

[Mailman-Developers] Log file rollovers

2003-10-09 Thread Nadim Shaikli
I've noticed some weird happenings with Mailman (v-2.1.2). As expected on the first of each month all the log files get rolled over (so vette becomes vette.1 and bounce becomes bounce.1, etc). Every so often I see files that are created but are not used. For instance, I'm looking at my log

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Log file rollovers

2003-10-09 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You didn't say on what type and version the system is, which is important because things like log file rollovers aren't really part of mailman proper but rather are done as part of the system specific Sorry about that. I'm on a debian box running

Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced in archives

2003-09-26 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 12:15, Martin Maechler wrote: The mailman-builtin archiving engine (pipermail) is really not that great It's better than nothing, but no one has ever made great claims about it. Unfortunately, no one has stepped up to

[Mailman-Developers] Scripts' consistency

2003-09-16 Thread Nadim Shaikli
A minor (non-critical) suggestion. It would be ideal if all the scripts had similar input/command-line formats and were grouped per type. For instance add_members clone_member find_member list_members remove_members sync_members all deal with members so maybe they should be named

[Mailman-Developers] Message held emails

2003-09-05 Thread Nadim Shaikli
I've been meaning to mention this for awhile - its nothing major just something that's annoyed a number of us. Whenever an email is held, the list owner gets an email of the following format, ## Begin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LISTNAME post from [EMAIL

Re: [Mailman-Developers] script

2003-09-04 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 20 August 2003 11:35 pm, Phil Barnett wrote: Has anyone created a script they'd like to share that kills off the sobig stuff sitting on hold? In the grand tradition of replying to myself... Here is the script I cobbled up. It

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 'empty module name' error and shunting

2003-08-27 Thread Nadim Shaikli
--- Larry Price wrote: On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Nadim Shaikli wrote: If I try to 'unshunt' the message - nothing happens and it simply pops back into the qfiles/shunt dir. I have hoards of people waiting for this to get resolved and I've tried asking anyone who would

[Mailman-Developers] 'empty module name' error and shunting

2003-08-18 Thread Nadim Shaikli
I've seen a number of posts (courtesy of Google) about this topic, yet not a single one noted a solution. All either were resolved with, 1. upgrade and it will go away (I have the latest of everything) 2. this only happens on spam (bad header), don't worry about it. 3. you are using a RH RPM

[Mailman-Developers] 'empty module name' error and shunting

2003-08-18 Thread Nadim Shaikli
I've seen a number of posts (courtesy of Google) about this topic, yet not a single one noted a solution. All either were resolved with, 1. upgrade and it will go away (I have the latest of everything) 2. this only happens on spam (bad header), don't worry about it. 3. you are using a RH RPM