Le samedi 20 février 2016 à 19:52:49+, Bernhard Schmidt a écrit :
> Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> > Before requesting for sponsorship, and packaging officially the other
> > components of mailman3, I'd like some "testers" for the core package I
> > built,
Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Hi Pierre,
> Before requesting for sponsorship, and packaging officially the other
> components of mailman3, I'd like some "testers" for the core package I
> built, in order to be sure that it works, and that I will not introduce some
> stupid
Le lundi 14 décembre 2015 à 17:01:57+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> Le lundi 23 novembre 2015 à 02:56:27+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> > Le vendredi 11 septembre 2015 à 00:49:44+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit
> > :
> > > [packaging mailman3]
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > Here is an
Le lundi 23 novembre 2015 à 02:56:27+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> Le vendredi 11 septembre 2015 à 00:49:44+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> > [packaging mailman3]
>
> Hey,
>
> Here is an update.
>
> For now on, I focused on mailman3-core package in order to get good
> practices
Le lundi 14 décembre 2015 à 17:36:10+0100, Simon Hanna a écrit :
> On 12/14/2015 05:01 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> >One can find my work here : https://github.com/P-EB/mailman3-core
> >Small bump here, I'd appreciate if somebody finds the time to tell me two
> >things:
> >
> > * Is my
Le vendredi 11 septembre 2015 à 00:49:44+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> [packaging mailman3]
Hey,
Here is an update.
For now on, I focused on mailman3-core package in order to get good
practices working.
One can find my work here : https://github.com/P-EB/mailman3-core
I'm working on
On ven. 11 sept. 2015 à 10:06:12, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> >Mailman3 (or mailman-suite) would be a trivial package that depends on
> >all of the above.
>
> Yep, though I'd go with something like mailman3-suite. Or you can reserve the
>
Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
> Stephen, I was considering that 3.1 would be a better one to release in
> debian, but maybe starting before would be good to see how things
> would go.
Yes, and yes. What I recommended was that you announce "beta" testing
once 3.1 is released and you've updated
On ven. 11 sept. 2015 à 15:49:48, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Simon Hanna writes:
>
> > Actually mailman-core is fully functional all alone.
>
> That's not really true. Sure, you can telnet to the REST port and
> speak REST by hand, but that's hardly pleasant. At a minimum, you
> need
Simon Hanna writes:
> Actually mailman-core is fully functional all alone.
That's not really true. Sure, you can telnet to the REST port and
speak REST by hand, but that's hardly pleasant. At a minimum, you
need mailmanclient. (There will be alternatives, there was a GSoC
project to provide
On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>As a Debian fanboy and also a mailman addict, I'd like to try packaging it
>in Debian.
Excellent! Do check wnpp to make sure there's not already an ITP for Mailman
3. Note too that there is already a Mailman 2 package, so you might
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:26:44AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
>
> > It seems that if I want to have a good source package, I need 5 repos :
> >
> > - Mailman
> > - HyperKitty
> > - Postorius
> > - HyperKitty - MailMan Plugin
> > - MailmanClient
>
12 matches
Mail list logo