-- Forwarded message --
From: Udit Saxena saxena.u...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSOC 2013 - Introduction and Project
Discussion
To:
I'm having problems installing the environment. From the 5 minute guide
installation page:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Terri Oda te...@zone12.com wrote:
On 13-04-07 8:00 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
This would solve the environment problem for students! Dunno if it's
strictly better than an AWS instance, but I bet many would prefer it.
I *do* have an older fedora vm set
Stephen wrote:
This would solve the environment problem for students! Dunno if it's
strictly better than an AWS instance, but I bet many would prefer it.
I had mentioned sharing an AMI instance with mailman 'working' on it but
for some reason had lagged. I did not configure it to send mail
A while back, I proposed contributing to MM3 in the area of archive
searching and MM2 backwards -compatibility and am considering further,
still:
Some research I wanted to share is: When navigating some Apache projects, I
discovered many are hosted on one of four platforms [per
I promise to try and do better proof-reading for the emails I post. To
correct how my earlier email reads, please interpret the question I asked
as:
..what if we could invite/reach out to administrators who've chosen to host
their apache project-lists using 'mod_mbox approach' to consider MM3 as
On Apr 08, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Chris Cargile wrote:
..what if we could invite/reach out to administrators who've chosen to host
their apache project-lists using 'mod_mbox approach' to consider MM3 as a
replacement solution?
Please note too that MM3 supports an IArchiver interface, for which
On Apr 08, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ooh, tasty! How about a Mailman Raspberry Pi?
Seriously, Barry, ya think it's possible?
This would solve the environment problem for students! Dunno if it's
strictly better than an AWS instance, but I bet many would prefer it.
It's a
On Apr 08, 2013, at 04:07 PM, Surya Kasturi wrote:
Since no one had so far configured mailman on windows, I guess, I can try
it (not now but.. later on). Why not we build an executable for windows
(.exe) for users to install? This could take sometime to port and solve
conflicts.. but at the end,
On 13-04-08 10:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
The thing about Windows is that we're using several *nix-isms in
process management and possibly in other places. I have no burning
desire to try to make these Windows compatible.
I'll bet the documentation would bite us pretty badly, too.
While I
Surya Kasturi writes:
Since no one had so far configured mailman on windows, I guess, I
can try it (not now but.. later on). Why not we build an executable
for windows (.exe) for users to install? This could take sometime
to port and solve conflicts.. but at the end, it would be superb.
Hi ,
Sorry for the late reply , I have been out of the city and I came back to
the college yesterday only .
Welcome to our community,
Glad to be a part of the community , I hope to contribute towards the
development of Gnu Mailman :)
I'm happy to see that you are interested in the REST
Although we would like for MM3 to run on Python 3, I don't think that all of
our dependency libraries are ready for that yet.
I am running MM under Python 2.7
Richard
On Apr 8, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Udit Saxena saxena.u...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Udit
On Apr 08, 2013, at 07:02 AM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
Although we would like for MM3 to run on Python 3, I don't think that all of
our dependency libraries are ready for that yet. I am running MM under
Python 2.7
We're down to two dependencies: restish and storm. I took a crack at restish,
Hi,
I am an undergrad computer science student at manipal institute of
technology, india and a prospective gsoc 2013 participant. I have a nice
experience in django,bootstrap, jquery and json which i got during my
previous internship.
I really liked most of the mailman project ideas and started
Well, the Django ORM does run on python 3. So, even if it isn't the best, it
is a possibility.
Richard
On Apr 8, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote:
On Apr 08, 2013, at 07:02 AM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
Although we would like for MM3 to run on Python 3, I don't think
On Apr 08, 2013, at 01:59 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
Well, the Django ORM does run on python 3. So, even if it isn't the best,
it is a possibility.
Is it usable outside of Django?
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Hi everyone,
the list of organizations accepted for GSoC this year has been announced,
but apparently google-melange.com suffers from a little end of countdown
stress and only displays a small number of them. So a quick announcement
for those of you currently watching that page:
Like last year
Barry Warsaw wrote:
IIRC, Mark was using Cygwin at one point.
Yes. Actually, my main Mailman 2.1 development platform is Cygwin, but
I gave up on trying to run MM 3 under Cygwin.
I don't recall all the issues, but there were several around file names
with unacceptable characters for Windows
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 15:03 +0530, Udit Saxena wrote:
2. Web Posting Interface.
I haven't really followed the GSoC ideas for MM3 this year but that line
poped-up on my radar.
Isn't this similar/overlapping to what HyperKitty already does?
I don't think one would want to embed posting messages
Hi Rahul,
2013/4/6 Rahul Gaur rahul@gmail.com
So , last night I tried my hand on django-rest-framework [0] and TastyPie
[1] as well.
What I could figure out with my two quick and dirty hands on applications
of both the frameworks , the django-rest-framework is a bit more lengthy (
but
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 15:03 +0530, Udit Saxena wrote:
2. Web Posting Interface.
Isn't this similar/overlapping to what HyperKitty already does?
No. There's no reason why a web posting interface needs to interact
with the archives; it can talk directly to
On 13-04-08 5:27 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 15:03 +0530, Udit Saxena wrote:
2. Web Posting Interface.
Isn't this similar/overlapping to what HyperKitty already does?
No. There's no reason why a web posting interface needs to
Let me suggest that it would be useful to have the student develop something
which could act as a plug-in module for any website. If we assume that there is
an optional archiver such as hyperkitty, there should be a mechanism to seed
the submission (in-reply-to, quoted text, etc.). But, if the
23 matches
Mail list logo
