Howdy. I am currently running 2.1b5 of Mailman and am trying to sort out an
issue with archiving that has crept up.
The problem has been mentioned previously from what I can tell but no
resolution seems to have been mentioned.
What the problem is that list archives (for reasons I won't bore
Howdy. Since no one replied with any suggestions for me I decided to take a
chance with a crude little hack to deal with the archiver getting confused
when the unicode type returned was None. This also brought up a bug with
the attachment handling code in the archiver though which again, I
Howdy. I just upgraded to the latest 2.1.2 stable source (I had been running
the last beta previously). After upgrading, as expected all template files
got stomped on so I set about recreating them as appropriate. After doing so
however I have two stumpers which looking at the source code
On July 30, 2003 06:11 pm, you wrote:
Howdy. I just upgraded to the latest 2.1.2 stable source (I had been
running the last beta previously). After upgrading, as expected all
template files got stomped on so I set about recreating them as
appropriate. After doing so however I have two
On July 31, 2003 01:58 pm, you wrote:
There is a known bug in MM 2.1.2 (and earlier 2.1.x) for which a patch
is available. This patch has been folded into the CVS and should thus
appear in the next release of MM (2.1.3?) but for the moment it is
applicable to 2.1.2; see:
On July 31, 2003 04:03 pm, you wrote:
mailmanctl restart after making the code change. The cache is in
process memory and is freshly created on demand within each process
each time the mailman daemons or scripts are started. You will also
need to rebuild existing mail archives using bin/arch
On July 31, 2003 04:52 pm, you wrote:
To get a single % use %%. For example, running python from the command
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
TypeError: not enough arguments for format string
Thanks Richard, that was the ticket. Mailman wasn't recording any
Howdy. I did my best to find this in all of the FAQs, online docs, INSTALL
and UPGRADE readmes (which are somewhat out of date) and had no luck.
I just upgraded to 2.14 of Mailman which of course stomped on my nice archive
templates which linked to my swish-e searching amongst other things.
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:32, Alan Batie wrote:
This is *not* a positive move.
I 100% agree. Since Mailman is designed to be installed from the shell (and
certain commands run from the shell) and since a web / mail server likely is
not going to have a GUI installed on it, the docs should
