[pabs]
Hi,
Is this list broken, or has everyone left?
The list seems to work, so I guess it's just a case of everyone being
silent for a few days...
--
Harald
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
From: Axel Beckert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Announce] Critical security update for Mailman 2.1.5
and earlier
To: mailman-developers@python.org
I just want to share my experiences with the patch:
Am Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:41:05AM -0500, Barry Warsaw schrieb:
There is
[John A. Martin]
Harald == Harald Meland
Harald It is not clear to me that Mailman *is* an MTA. It is not
Harald an SMTP server, and is not (necessarily) an SMTP client.
To have been precise perhaps I should have said something like a mail
agent must not muck with an existing
[Barry Warsaw]
I really really want to use something like message-ids to generate
message file names. I want to be able to generate links to archived
messages in the footers, but I think the best way to do that is to agree
on a reproducible, independent algorithm for calculating them.
What
[Barry Warsaw]
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote:
2) Whenever Mailman receives a message whose message-id is already
present in the archives, the original Message-Id: header is
renamed to e.g. X-Original-Message-Id:, and Mailman generates a
fresh (as in not yet
[John A. Martin]
baw == Barry Warsaw
Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives
Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:45:32 -0400
baw On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote:
[Barry Warsaw]
I really really want to use something like message-ids
[Greg Stark]
Before removing a subscriber mailman should send a message with
known content testing the address. Only if such a message bounces
should a user be dropped.
Uhm... what parts of such a known content message do you think can
safely be assumed to still be discernible when Mailman
[Peter C. Norton]
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 12:56 PM -0400 2003/09/12, John A. Martin wrote:
And, moreover, the choice should depend upon the file system and file
system options. As you know, all Linux boxen do not necessarily only
run ext2 even
[Barry Warsaw]
Except that when I did some very simple tests, I saw a 97% hit in
performance with fsync turned on.
Ouch. That's pretty severe, all right.
Even though I would *guess* that most casual Mailman sites would
pull through an effective halving of performance without any problems,
[Barry Warsaw]
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:30, Harald Meland wrote:
If there is enough demand for tree reorganization to require using a
completely new CVS module, has any thought been given to switching to
a revision control system that actually *supports* renames?
Thought about
[Barry Warsaw]
On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 00:37, Jeff Waugh wrote:
It might be a bit of extra work, but why not just copy the files around in
the repository? History is important! :-)
Two reasons:
- I'm not even sure what the directory structure is going to look like
yet, and I don't really
11 matches
Mail list logo
