Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-checkins] mailman3 README.txt, NONE, 3.0

2003-09-08 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:30, Harald Meland wrote: [ Replying to a 3.5-months-old message... hopefully my response lag time will improve shortly. :-) ] Yours and mine both! :) If there is enough demand for tree reorganization to require using a completely new CVS module, has any thought

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-checkins] mailman3 README.txt, NONE, 3.0

2003-09-08 Thread Harald Meland
[Barry Warsaw] On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:30, Harald Meland wrote: If there is enough demand for tree reorganization to require using a completely new CVS module, has any thought been given to switching to a revision control system that actually *supports* renames? Thought about it, but as

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-checkins] mailman3 README.txt, NONE, 3.0

2003-09-08 Thread Richard Barrett
I would assume that Barry is working on the it ain't broke so don't fix it principle and he is sufficiently busy that getting real work done is enough to be going on with (like outstanding bug fixes checked and applied to the CVS so that 2.1.3 can be generated and shipped). If that is the case

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-checkins] mailman3 README.txt, NONE, 3.0

2003-09-07 Thread Harald Meland
[Barry Warsaw] On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 00:37, Jeff Waugh wrote: It might be a bit of extra work, but why not just copy the files around in the repository? History is important! :-) Two reasons: - I'm not even sure what the directory structure is going to look like yet, and I don't really