Dear all, I run into trouble: I have started a 2000+ list and I
found out
NAME-OF-THE-LIST@
is not the same as
name-of-the-list@
People will use both- and what is worse: if I use the
name-of-list@ MAILAN wont even return an error message!
How do I fix this alias
Hi
I am new to mailman. I did not notice any searchable archives of the mailman
users list. I'm I mistaken? Did I overlook this. I would like to search for
answers to my questions on an archives list first before I start bugging
people with questions that have probably been answered before in
On Sunday, June 17, 2001, at 06:21 AM, alex wetmore wrote:
Please don't make this assumption. It is true for the commonly used
Unix MTAs, but it is not true for all MTAs.
you're misreading what I was doing here -- I'm looking at this based on
how it goes over the wire, not how it's
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 09:41:46 +
canario joe CJoe wrote:
People will use both- and what is worse: if I use the
name-of-list@ MAILAN wont even return an error message!
This is not a Mailman problem. This is a problem with your MTA
configuration.
--
J C Lawrence
however, how do you avoid the list administrator from changing
the list preferred domain in the web interface?
aw I don't know that you can. I trust my list administrators to
aw leave that alone, but the only list adminsitrators besides
aw myself are friends.
In
Hi all !
Someone can tell me how I do for setup a demo
Mailman mail list?
I need do it, but I don't know how ...
All the functions in the administrative panel,
must be disable (for security reasons).
Thanks for any help !
Samir
--
On 17 Jun 2001 20:13:52 -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sunday 17 June 2001 06:54 pm, you wrote:
I'm really hoping that someone can help me with this:
Mailman says that it's lost 4 messages. There's no trace of them in
mailman/data, and in /mailman/logs/vette, they're all listed as
Hi
I am an owner of a listproc list. I send appropriate commands such as ones
for information, the welcome message etc but get a negative respons. The
same problem arises when I request in postings somewhat similar files. What
is the problem.
My command lines follow the correct protocol -please
On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 01:19 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
CVR points. but we need to quantify what those points are and
CVR what the impact is, so we can decide just how to move forward
CVR on this.
I'd love to see any statistic you (or anybody) gathers on this
subject.
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
For this 55%, the SMTP=1 is 6050K. For 100, it's 1711K bytes. That's 28%
of the first number, so we're cutting 72% of the bandwidth by chunking
at 100. The tradeoff is performance, though -- it takes a lot longer to
deliver those AOL addresses,
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:46:47 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 01:19 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
I would set Mailman's 2.1 default to have this turned ON...
Agreed.
Barry's mileage may vary on his preferences for default, of
course, and it's his
11 matches
Mail list logo
