--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 2:06 PM -0600 Gary Frederick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to help someone set up a Mailman list. He has Debian, Mailman
version: 2.0.13-2 and Postfix's version: 1.1.11-2.
He looked over the web and the archives here and is stuck.
The problem:
After
Hi!
We just downloaded 2.1 (congratulations!)
Some questions came up:
1.) we have a problem with missing lists in the lists overview, while they
appear in the admin overview. Will this be fixed in 2.1, if not, what might
be wrong (settings already checked, same for all lists)
2.) can we
I've recently discovered that vacation autoresponders will subscribe
recipients to Mailman lists when they get invited.
This is not good. It makes the feature dangerous if you've promised to not
subscribe anyone without their assent.
Is there any way to avoid this problem, other than not using
He has it up and running. Thanks for the input.
It was an oops with the two aliases tables.
Thanks all.
Gary
Steve Burling wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 2:06 PM -0600 Gary Frederick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to help someone set up a Mailman list. He has Debian, Mailman
Hi there!
I'm sorry but I'm still in trouble... I modified the .qmail-* files
regarding alias to mailman wrapper but I'm continuing to have problem
on posting messages and get help from *-request (and some other
problem).
I have a RedHat 7.2, QMail using Plesk Control Panel 2.5. So, last
version
I upgraded to the very latest release of 2.1 and I still can't get
sync_members to work. I get either:
If I use:
sync_members -f /home/lists/testing.txt list-name
I get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/mailman/bin/sync_members, line 286, in ?
main()
File
Hi all,
I use the very useful Kathleen Webb's step guide to install mailman 2.1
on Jaguar 10.2.3. I know nothing about Unix...
Everything is OK till step 4 with the permissions. The two commands
make and bin/check_perms are not found... and I can't go on... I've
tried as administrator and
On 28 Teveth 5763, Jean-Michel Biraghi wrote:
I use the very useful Kathleen Webb's step guide to install mailman
2.1 on Jaguar 10.2.3. I know nothing about Unix...
Everything is OK till step 4 with the permissions. The two commands
make and bin/check_perms are not found... and I can't go
Thank you for your help so far on this issue. Have you found anything
new since your last email?
thanx,
chaim
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
I have posted on sourceforge MM 2.1 compatible versions of my patches to
support integration of MM with htdig.
There is now a third precursor patch that needs to be applied to correct
some defects in some HTML templates in the MM 2.1 distribution.
The order in which the patches should be
On 2 Jan 2003 at 11:27, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
chaim == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chaim Thank you for your help so far on this issue. Have you
chaim found anything new since your last email?
This was resolved in 2.1 final. You must have the python -devel
package installed,
chaim == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chaim Thank you for your help so far on this issue. Have you
chaim found anything new since your last email?
This was resolved in 2.1 final. You must have the python -devel
package installed, but the test for this was broken in the pre-2.1
final
chaim == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chaim Thank you. I downloaded the package from list.org and they
chaim didn't mention anything about it being pre-2.1 beta. Can
chaim you suggest where I can find the 2.1 final and what the
chaim exact size of the file should be?
Hello
Is there a way to set Full personalization as default for all mailing lists ?
I looked in Mailman/Default.py but I didn't find anything about it...
Guizmo
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Richard,
I have posted on sourceforge MM 2.1 compatible versions of my patches to
support integration of MM with htdig.
Many thanks for making the patches so quickly.
The order in which the patches should be applied is as follows:
GD == Guillaume Duteil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GD Is there a way to set Full personalization as default for
GD all mailing lists ?
Nope.
-Barry
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is probably a quick one, but I thought I would mail it out to the list. I
did check the archives, but didn't have much luck.
We are running 2.0.13 and I took on the task of upgrading to 2.1. Our RH-based
server is running Sendmail (8.12.7) and happily chugging along managing a few
dozen
Most of the upgrading suggestions relate to previous, non-CVS releases.
Any different/special procedures/gotchas to be aware of when
upgrading from a CVS (2.1b3+) distribution?
Thanks,
-Kenneth
--
Prof Kenneth H Jacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Science Dept
To Barry and the development team:
Thank you for MM2.1 final, your efforts and time
(and a great Christmas gift as well!)
Kaja
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman
KJ == Kenneth Jacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KJ Any different/special procedures/gotchas to be aware of when
KJ upgrading from a CVS (2.1b3+) distribution?
Shouldn't be.
-Barry
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a packaged rpm for RedHat 7.3 for Mailman 2.1?
David Parker
Systems/Network Administrator
Information Technology Services
City of Bryan, Bryan Texas
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DKP == David K Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DKP Is there a packaged rpm for RedHat 7.3 for Mailman 2.1?
If someone wants to build and contribute one, and own responsibility
for it, I'll be happy to add it as a file download on SF.
-Barry
I just installed Mailman 2.1 this morning. I'm discovering a couple
problems and I'm not sure if they are mine or mailman's.
1. When I go to the private archive for a list at
http://mcswartz.org.swartz/mailman/private/listname, I see the usual
possibilities. Unfortunately the links do not work.
Is there a packaged rpm for RedHat 7.3 for Mailman 2.1?
I'm sure that once 2.1 has been released for a bit an RPM will be created
based on RedHat 8.0.
Grant
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi:
I upgrade to Mailman 2.1 and found two things :
1-I have .mbox older than one year with archivers configured to one month.
I recreate the files and bin/arch seems to know not much about the years,
he mixes january from 2002 and 2003. Is there any way to avoid that if a
have more that a year
All the messages I get from the mailman-users list have no body. I am using the Lotus Notes client accessing mail on a lotus notes server. I can only see the message body if I use Notes webmail. Any ideas?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
I rolled an RPM earlier today. If anyone finds it useful, feel free to use it.
ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/i386/mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm
ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/SRPMS/mailman-2.1-1.src.rpm
Now the idea of own responsibility might be a little shaky. :)
-Rich
DKP == David K Parker
Greetings:
Using 2.0.8 under RedHat Linux 7.3 with no problems.
Is there an easy way to change a user's e-mail address in the database
without having to unsubscribe/resubscribe them? Failing that, how can I
do it while preserving their existing password??
I have noted the announcement of
Glen, Charles,
I forgot to install the Developer Tools indeed.
Thank's a lot.
Jean-Michel Biraghi
4D Hispano
El Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:54:00 -0500, Glen Foster escribió :
Jean-Michel.
You need to install the OS X Developer Tools to build software.
Glen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am running qmail as my MTA and I just installed 2.1 final and was
getting deferrals based on Illegal_command:_mailcmd/ and
Illegal_command:_mailowner/. I changed the aliases for the list to
use the commands request and owner instead of mailcmd and
mailowner and that fixed things. However,
Hi,
I'm trying out version 2.1 and am having problems with the 'advertised'
option. This can be changed by a list administrator and 'list_lists -a'
will show or not show it, depending on the current setting.
However, on the 'listinfo' page at 'http://.../mailman/listinfo/', it
doesn't show up;
Is there a way, via email to get a list of subscribers to a list?
Christopher Adams
Library Systems Analyst
Oregon State Library
503-378-4243 x258
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I am not mistaken the URL in the list DB must match the URL for the list.
So if I move a list from one server to another (different URL's) I have to run
bin/fix_url to update the URL in the list DB.
One way to check is the run bin/dumpdb, let it scroll, at the bottom will be
the list URL,
Under MM2.0.x I created separate installations for different virtual
hosts. This allowed me to create the same list name, on a different
virtual host without having mailman conflict. Now, with MM2.1, how
should I continue to do this? I have one single machine that hosts
several domains.
Hi,
when I start mailmanctl (with ./mailmanctl start)
it shows many errors:
# ./mailmanctl start
Starting Mailman's master qrunner.
Cannot import runner module Mailman.Queue.IncomingRunner
No module named _weakref
Cannot import runner module Mailman.Queue.VirginRunner
No module named _weakref
AMK == Ashley M Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AMK Under MM2.0.x I created separate installations for
AMK different virtual hosts. This allowed me to create the same
AMK list name, on a different virtual host without having mailman
AMK conflict. Now, with MM2.1, how
ST == Sebastian Talmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I use Mailman 2.1 with
| Python 2.1.1 (#1, Oct 25 2001, 09:53:13)
| [GCC 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)] on linux
Start by upgrading to Python 2.1.3. I'm not sure that's your problem,
but I just tested it with that version and it worked
I apologize for my total ignorance of Python - the only programming I
usually do is of concerts and recitals :-)
The upgrading readme for 2.1 mentions problems with versions having
plaintext patch #413752. I followed the links and read all that is
there, and also searched the archives, but am
I guess now that mm2.1 has been released, general questions should go
here? If not, let me know and I'll send to -dev.
Just installed mm2.1 and moved over some lists yesterday. Today I found
the following in logs/error:
Jan 02 18:58:19 2003 (35619) message is unparsable:
I don't use Qmail, so others will have to speak up, but you might look
at the following two patches:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=645513group_id=103atid=300103
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=621257group_id=103atid=300103
to see if they help
jb == jorge becerra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jb 1-I have .mbox older than one year with archivers configured
jb to one month. I recreate the files and bin/arch seems to know
jb not much about the years, he mixes january from 2002 and
jb 2003. Is there any way to avoid that if
MJ == Matthias Jänichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MJ 1.) we have a problem with missing lists in the lists
MJ overview, while they appear in the admin overview. Will this
MJ be fixed in 2.1, if not, what might be wrong (settings already
MJ checked, same for all lists)
Are you
NWC == NOW Website Coordinator [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NWC I upgraded to the very latest release of 2.1 and I still
NWC can't get sync_members to work.
Dumb bugs on my part. Here's a patch.
-Barry
Index: sync_members
RW == Rich West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RW I rolled an RPM earlier today. If anyone finds it useful,
RW feel free to use it.
RW ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/i386/mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm
RW ftp://ftp.wesmo.com/pub/redhat/SRPMS/mailman-2.1-1.src.rpm
RW Now the idea of own
JS == John Swartzentruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JS 1. When I go to the private archive for a list at
JS http://mcswartz.org.swartz/mailman/private/listname, I see the
---^^^
Wow, I wasn't aware that swartz was a new TLD. :)
JS Is this a problem in
DP == Dan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DP I apologize for my total ignorance of Python - the only
DP programming I usually do is of concerts and recitals :-)
Cool! One of these days we definitely need a Mailman jam session. :)
DP The upgrading readme for 2.1 mentions
BF == Bryan Fullerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BF I guess now that mm2.1 has been released, general questions
BF should go here? If not, let me know and I'll send to -dev.
Yes. For now, I'm reading this list and trying to answer questions
just to get folks familiar with 2.1. At some
I just upgraded to 2.1 and noticed an interesting race condition with
the summary version of the moderation page.
Take this timeline:
1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends 3 messages to the list
2) moderator visits summary moderation page and sees the 3 messages
3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends another
48 matches
Mail list logo
