I had been running MM 2.0.13 for some time now. I upgraded to 2.1 on my test system,
RH 8 running Postfix 2 and had no problems. SO I upgraded my production system, RH 7.1
with Postfix 1.1.11 and am now unable to send messages to the lists.
I have tried running configure with -prefixes that I
Is anyone here using Mailman on OS X? I've followed the instructions
put together by Kathleen Webb at
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg12599.html
but keep getting this when I try to create a 'test' list:
[ibb-80:~] mailman% /Applications/mailman/bin/newlist
Enter the
Hi,
* Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start by upgrading to Python 2.1.3. I'm not sure that's your problem,
but I just tested it with that version and it worked for me:
thank you! Yes, that was the problem.
btw, the futures in the new Version are very nice - good work!
Stanton Schell wrote:
Illegal_command:_mailowner/. I changed the aliases for the list to
use the commands request and owner instead of mailcmd and
mailowner and that fixed things.
So you changed this line inside .qmail-list-* :
|preline /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman mailcmd listname
Just installed 2.1 over the top of 2.1rc3. No problems.
However am looking for the personalization parameter in the web
interface, but can't find it.
Cheers
Brian
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Mitel SMEserver Contributions
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:09:15 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
JS == John Swartzentruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JS 1. When I go to the private archive for a list at
JS http://mcswartz.org.swartz/mailman/private/listname, I see the
---^^^
Wow, I wasn't aware
What are you using for Password authentication on your system? Are you
using PAMs? What does your /etc/nsswitch.conf file look like (are you
using NIS)?
NIS is used, but the mailman user account info is local to the web server.
Mailman's home directory, though, is shared between the web
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 11:24 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
This is normal, and no, you don't need to worry about the lost data
files. In fact, once you get comfortable that the only bad messages
are spam, you can set QRUNNER_SAVE_BAD_MESSAGES=0 in your mm_cfg.py to
just discard them.
Dan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I located if self.data_version = mm_cfg.DATA_FILE_VERSION: at line
611 of the /Mailman/MailList.py file. Is this what needs to be altered?
Do I just make the change to that file then run ./configure?
I am using 2.1b5 and I needed to set OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION to 1 in
/Mailman/Default.py
After doing this, I had a new option in nondigest section
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:45:56 +
Brian Read [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just installed 2.1 over the top of 2.1rc3. No problems.
Mailman is part of my hosting plan and I am
accessing it through cpanel at my admin site. I am configuring my list and have
gotten pretty far except for the following:
subscribed myself-got confirmation email-sent reply
to confirm, but reply email came back demon saying account no longer
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 11:11 AM, Guillaume Duteil wrote:
I am using 2.1b5 and I needed to set
OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION to 1 in /Mailman/Default.py
Humm, this is the right setting, but you know you should not be
changing Mailman/Defaults.py, right?
From Defaults.py:
# NEVER
KR == Kyle Rhorer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR This might be a good opportunity to remind folks that prudent
KR system administration practice dictates one make not only
KR frequent, scheduled backups, but also a one-off backup before
KR upgrading software. I'm sure we all know
On Thursday 02 January 2003 21:40, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MJ 2.) can we switch back to 2.0.13 easily in case we encounter
a MJ problem or do the DBs get converted somehow?
Yes, of course they do! No, you cannot easily downgrade, so I'd
suggest making backups first if you're concerned.
It WORKS! I'm ELATED!
I'm not sure what exactly I did, except meticulously go through
Kathleen's instructions ONE MORE TIME!
One hint: if you get as far as successfully creating the 'test' list
but can't connect to the web portion try two things:
1) make sure you have around the your
* Bill Whitacre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is anyone here using Mailman on OS X? I've followed the instructions
put together by Kathleen Webb at
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg12599.html
but keep getting this when I try to create a 'test' list:
[ibb-80:~]
Anyone using Cpanel 5 to administer Mailman? The
GUI is totally different then the programming and I need help on some basics. I
am a first time user that is about 90% done but I'm stuck on a few
things.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
How can I get the list hostname in MTA/Utils.py ? I'm hacking the
_makealiases routines and I need to get the list hostname to add it.
Nevermind. Got it from mm_cfg.DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST (once defined)
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape
How can I get the list hostname in MTA/Utils.py ? I'm hacking the
_makealiases routines and I need to get the list hostname to add it.
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+
Ashley M. Kirchner
At 16:03 03/01/2003, David Gibbs wrote:
Dan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I located if self.data_version = mm_cfg.DATA_FILE_VERSION: at line
611 of the /Mailman/MailList.py file. Is this what needs to be altered?
Do I just make the
Just did another reinstall of 2.0.13. Again, installed with no problems.
Check_perm ran fine... again
And, the list ownerships for the config.db file for my test list is:
-rw-rw 1 mailman mailman 3169 Jan 03 11:57 config.db
(owned and group-owned by mailman)
Then, I log into the
Howdy,
I successfully upgraded from 2.0.13 to 2.1 today, with minimal fuss
and pain. Some comments:
a) I can no longer get sync_members to work. It always gives the
following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /opt/mailman/bin/sync_members, line 286, in ?
main()
I signed up for mailman user by mistake. I need to know how to unsubscribe.
Please Help!
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
At 10:58 PM 01/02/2003 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
NWC == NOW Website Coordinator [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NWC I upgraded to the very latest release of 2.1 and I still
NWC can't get sync_members to work.
Dumb bugs on my part. Here's a patch.
-Barry
Thanks for the patch! All is
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:06:09 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I signed up for mailman user by mistake. I need to know how to
unsubscribe.
Please Help!
I don't suppose you'd consider looking at the bottom of every post
that comes from the list?
--
Raquel
I am still running 2.1b5, and would like to upgrade to 2.1RC1... but I'd
like to resolve this one eetsy problem.
I had failed to create the mailman list as the first list in my install.
I have since done so--but I still get the cron error:
Site list is missing: mailman
So I figure, hey.. I
At 21:03 03/01/2003, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
Howdy,
I successfully upgraded from 2.0.13 to 2.1 today, with minimal fuss
and pain. Some comments:
a) I can no longer get sync_members to work. It always gives the
following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
GS == Glenn Sieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GS I am still running 2.1b5, and would like to upgrade to
GS 2.1RC1... but I'd like to resolve this one eetsy problem.
GS I had failed to create the mailman list as the first list in
GS my install. I have since done so--but I still get
JAE == Jeff A Earickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JAE I successfully upgraded from 2.0.13 to 2.1 today, with
JAE minimal fuss and pain. Some comments:
JAE a) I can no longer get sync_members to work. It always gives
JAE the following error:
Yep, known bug. I posted a patch
You should talk to your hosting folks about this.
I'm not familiar with CPanel but does it have a switch you need to
toggle after creating a group (something that re-initializes your local
mail aliases)?
Good Luck - Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:42, Swytchcraft Audio wrote:
Mailman is
Don't quote me, but doesn't status 1 mean, that it couldn't locate (or
run) the alias?
Does /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman exist as an executable program?
What happens if you try to run that command by hand (su as the user
postfix first)?
Good Luck - Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 12:35,
At 06:46 PM 1/3/2003 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw posted the following...
It would be worth investigating why you still get this. You shouldn't!
I'm in full agreement with you on this :)
You cd to /usr/local/mailman and type bin/list_lists. Does the
mailman list show up there? It should.
I have a problem with mailman,
When I send mail to the list this message is coming
back:
-
The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
- Transcript of session follows -
554 5.4.6 Too
many hops 26
Glenn Sieb wrote:
Ok cool.. I'll hang out on 2.1b5 then until 2.1 final comes out...
2.1 final is out.
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+
Ashley M. Kirchner mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
At 05:34 PM 1/3/2003 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner posted the following...
2.1 final is out.
D'oh.. I guess I missed the announcement.. thanks :)
Glenn
---
The original portions of this message are the copyright of the author
(c)1998-2002 Glenn E. Sieb.ICQ UIN: 300395IRC Nick:
*sigh* *puts on dunce cap* *sits in corner*
Mailman's crontab was pointing to /usr/local/mailman2.1 instead of
/usr/local/mailman (2.1 was a test I did at one point, which ended up being
rolled into /usr/local/mailman
Can someone pass me the sugar-free Red Bull? My brain needs a boost LOL
At 11:43 PM 1/3/2003 +, Richard Barrett wrote:
At 21:03 03/01/2003, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
Question: How to I get searchable archives? Like
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
for my own mailing-list archives? How come this doesn't come as
a part of Mailman?
The
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 06:39 PM, Phydeaux wrote:
My worry about doing this is what happens when I want to upgrade MM
afterward? If I have a non-standard installation what kind of
nightmare am
I setting myself up for down the road?
my approach is to not use pipermail. My archives are
I'm getting a blank page (this page has no data) consistently from three
different ISPs
Is there another source to get the patches from?
Thanks in advance,
Glenn
---
The original portions of this message are the copyright of the author
(c)1998-2002 Glenn E. Sieb.ICQ UIN: 300395IRC
I recently upgraded to 2.1 from 2.0.13.
A number of my users are complaining about extra headers being placed
in the digests. I'm using the default setting for
DEFAULT_DIGEST_PLAIN_KEEP_HEADERS which is:
DEFAULT_PLAIN_DIGEST_KEEP_HEADERS = ['message', 'date', 'from',
DL On most directories, each file to be installed is enumerated
DL and installed within a loop, however, for the icons directory,
DL the Makefile seems to rely on wildcard matching. That may not
DL be a valid assumption.
Could be a GNU Make-ism. Maybe Solaris's make doesn't do
DS == David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS I just upgraded to 2.1 and noticed an interesting race
DS condition with the summary version of the moderation page.
DS Take this timeline:
DS 1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends 3 messages to the list 2) moderator
DS visits summary
l == ljacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
l I had been running MM 2.0.13 for some time now. I upgraded to
l 2.1 on my test system, RH 8 running Postfix 2 and had no
l problems. SO I upgraded my production system, RH 7.1 with
l Postfix 1.1.11 and am now unable to send messages to
At 16:55 03/01/2003, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 11:11 AM, Guillaume Duteil wrote:
I am using 2.1b5 and I needed to set OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION
to 1 in /Mailman/Default.py
Humm, this is the right setting, but you know you should not be changing
The ownership issue is a red-herring. As long as it's group owned by
mailman and it's g+rw you should be fine.
I'm guessing somewhere along the way Python got upgraded and the
status of the crypt libraries changed (either they were there before
and not now, or vice versa). Try setting
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 02:00:46 -0500
To: David LeVine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1 Install Issues
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw)
DL On most directories, each file to be installed is enumerated
DL and installed within a loop,
46 matches
Mail list logo
