Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman questionsThanks for the response! In the link you
included it said I can configure Mailman to remove the footer, but it does not say
how. Can you direct me?
Jen
- Original Message -
From: Brad Knowles
To: Jen Onsum
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Every since switching to mailman, I have been vexed by a performance
problem. Originally, I thought it was my old server. It was getting
long in the tooth and in the need of retiring. Last month I replaced it
and got my lists up and running with no problem on the new server.
However, my
At 10:43 PM -0400 2004-07-20, David Carter wrote:
I seem to have a process that has a mind of its own. It keeps consuming
CPU (as much as it can get), but it doesn't seem to be doing anything.
No logs are getting updated, and no actions are being performed.
Have you checked the page at
In moving lists from one host to another (older MM2.0 to 2.1) I noticed that
while update will convert lists, it leaves bad remnants of the old host
within the config.pck ie the hostname. This includes the web_page_url
and hostnames of umbrella lists if you have sublists. The result being
once I
I am still running an older version of mailman until we upgrade to a new
server in a month or so, but I have a need to reject 100% of the
non-subscribers on at least one of the listservs. There are a few ways I
could do this:
The first is to intercept the message before it hits the list, parse the
I don't know if this is possible but I'd like to ask anyway.
Although I can disable sending rfc2369 using Mailman I'd rather not.
Is there a way of removing certain parts of it and am I allowed to do
that?
If still interested:
I wish to remove the url references to the webserver for
That was one of the first places I looked. Nothing.
Dave
At 04:21 AM 7/21/2004, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:43 PM -0400 2004-07-20, David Carter wrote:
I seem to have a process that has a mind of its own. It keeps consuming
CPU (as much as it can get), but it doesn't seem to be doing anything.
No
On Jul 21, 2004, at 8:19 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I am still running an older version of mailman until we upgrade to a
new
server in a month or so, but I have a need to reject 100% of the
non-subscribers on at least one of the listservs. There are a few ways
I
could do this:
The first is to
I see the html attachment was stripped, here's the listinfo.html page
attached as a .txt file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brendan Chard
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 4:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Customizing
On Jul 21, 2004, at 8:26 AM, Rob Hackney wrote:
I don't know if this is possible but I'd like to ask anyway.
Although I can disable sending rfc2369 using Mailman I'd rather not.
Is there a way of removing certain parts of it and am I allowed to do
that?
If still interested:
I wish to remove the
Messages that come from Outlook (via Exchange) in HTML format through a
Mailman 2.1 list have the list footer added as an attachment to the
email as it comes through the list. Didn't do this under version 2.0.
Any way to stop this from happening on those emails?
Thanks,
Darren Young
Senior UNIX
On 21 Jul 2004 at 4:22, Brad Knowles wrote:
Hmm. If I am answering too many questions, then maybe it is time
for me to leave.
No, Brad, I wouldn't want you to do that.
Barry can't be on this list very much due to work/time conflicts,
and I think you'll agree that his time is
The web interface for mailman is not working...
its shows all the details fine, but doesnot commit the changes i make,
like i can not change setting of users, approve/reject messages,
anything...
I do not see any error messages anywhere in the logs..
Pls help
Sunil Ranta
Darren Young wrote:
Messages that come from Outlook (via Exchange) in HTML format through a
Mailman 2.1 list have the list footer added as an attachment to the
email as it comes through the list. Didn't do this under version 2.0.
Any way to stop this from happening on those emails?
See
At 8:41 PM +0530 2004-07-21, root wrote:
The web interface for mailman is not working...
its shows all the details fine, but doesnot commit the changes i make,
like i can not change setting of users, approve/reject messages,
anything...
See
I'm just reiterating this question. Has anyone else had this issue? I
am using mailman-2.1.5.
Moderation request emails are occasionally being sent to the
administrator/moderator at 8:00am for nonexistent moderation requests.
In other words, nothing shows up under Tend to pending moderator
Hello folks
I just started to use mailman. I have near 2200 suscribers, I am using
mailman mostly like a newsletter.
I'd like to know which is the way mailman proceds to deliver the messages I
send. The problem is that my server only allows to send messages to no more
than 300 destinataries per
At 11:25 AM -0600 2004-07-21, Nathan wrote:
Moderation request emails are occasionally being sent to the
administrator/moderator at 8:00am for nonexistent moderation requests.
In other words, nothing shows up under Tend to pending moderator
requests on the web interface after receiving one of
At 12:49 PM -0500 2004-07-21, David Elias Sanchez Vasquez wrote:
I just started to use mailman. I have near 2200 suscribers, I am using
mailman mostly like a newsletter.
That's a typical use.
I'd like to know which is the way mailman proceds to deliver the messages I
send. The problem is
At 11:23 AM -0700 2004-07-21, Alexander Storman wrote:
We are looking for a way to password protect sending of messages in Mailman.
Is there a way to setup a password inside the email body for outgoing
messages?
I'm not aware of anything, no.
Do I have any options other than forcing a
Hello!
I have a problem, and i still can't get the right answer for it, maybe
you could help me.
I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and
saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the
archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what
At 02:23 PM 7/21/2004, Alexander Storman wrote:
Hi All,
We are having issues with email being spoofed from M$ viruses that have
managed to get most of our company email addresses.
Viruses are getting through since they are spoofed as addresses that have
unmoderated approval to send to the list.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Storman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi All,
We are having issues with email being spoofed from M$ viruses that have
managed to get most of our company email addresses. Viruses are getting
through since they are spoofed as addresses that have unmoderated
Ronny Raschkowan wrote:
I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and
saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the
archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i did, providing
bin/arch mylist [mbox].
It seems from what you say
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Ronny Raschkowan wrote:
I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and
saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the
archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i did, providing
bin/arch mylist [mbox].
It
Ronny Raschkowan wrote:
This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back.
If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the
old numbers, you could always add 3633 dummy messages to the beginning
of the .mbox file and then
bin/arch --wipe [listname]
I think
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Ronny Raschkowan wrote:
This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back.
If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the
old numbers, you could always add 3633 dummy messages to the beginning
of the .mbox file and then
bin/arch
I spend most of my time now with mailing lists manually rejecting posts
from non-members from the dozens and dozens of spam messages each lists
gets on a daily basis. Is there some way to auto-reject or auto-drop
posts from non-subscribers that is more elegant than simply dumping the
entire
C == C L Etheridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
C In other words, an e-mail send to a list via Smartlist in the
C TO field has the name of the list NOT the e-mail address of
C the recipient.
Please note that not only do all mailing list servers do this, but
many users _depend_ on it to
LuKreme wrote:
I spend most of my time now with mailing lists manually rejecting posts
from non-members from the dozens and dozens of spam messages each lists
gets on a daily basis. Is there some way to auto-reject or auto-drop
posts from non-subscribers that is more elegant than simply
Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
C == C L Etheridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
C In other words, an e-mail send to a list via Smartlist in the
C TO field has the name of the list NOT the e-mail address of
C the recipient.
excellent material snipped
C This results in
31 matches
Mail list logo
