Ben == Ben Discoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Wow. I had no idea at all that it was possible to run Apache
Ben _inside_ Cygwin. The Apache website directs Windows people
Ben to just install and run, so the alternate route is not well
Ben known.
You might want to just take a
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ben == Ben Discoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Wow. I had no idea at all that it was possible to run Apache
Ben _inside_ Cygwin. The Apache website directs Windows people
Ben to just install and run, so the alternate route is not well
Ben known.
I foolishly tried to upgrade from mailman 2.0.x to Mailman 2.1.6, and I
heartily repent of my sin. I have attempted to restore back to my working
version, but its still not running. Can anyone help me?
Bill McNutt
IT Administrator, UT Center for Literacy Studies
http://cls.coe.utk.edu
mcnutt wrote:
I foolishly tried to upgrade from mailman 2.0.x to Mailman 2.1.6, and I
heartily repent of my sin. I have attempted to restore back to my working
version, but its still not running. Can anyone help me?
snip
- Transcript of session follows -
Traceback (most recent call
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:22 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
May be we should set this default in Defaults.py.in in the next release
of 2.1.7. Thoughts?
It's probably a good idea, but also as Stephen says, it might be a good
idea to shorten the filename (keeping the extension) even when this
value
Hi all,
I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for
the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small
mistake when tagging the release number. I will be releasing 2.1.7
final by December 31 if there is no problem.
Please download it from SF or:
Oops, Sorry for the typo in the message title. I mean
Released: Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Hi all,
I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for
the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small
mistake when
