Am 26.01.2006 um 19:06 Uhr +0100 schrieb Brad Knowles:
At 6:46 PM +0100 2006-01-26, Hauke Fath wrote:
I haven't found a way of tweaking this and assume that the list URLs
are made up dynamically by the cgi script (rather, binary).
Does anybody else see this? Any pointers?
The URLs
At 9:05 PM -0500 2006-01-26, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Fortunately, in this case it is a known issue (which others have
apparently decided to portray in a very different way), and which has
already been addressed (as described by Tokio).
OK, but what about the next one? What do Mailman
Brad Knowles wrote:
There is a QA process that such patches need to go through, even if
we're talking about a bug that is being currently being exploited widely.
In fact, the more it's being exploited, and the more dangerous it
is, I think the more testing needs to be done to
At 1:00 AM -0500 2006-01-27, Jim Popovitch wrote:
I'm pretty sure that the
insiders fix their systems first, then tell the rest of us about the
patch, probably at the last minute possible.
The insiders here are people like Barry, Tokio,
Team:
I have some issues with my mailing list.
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their posts
for some reason. And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to apporove it. Any ideas???
Thanks,
LDB
I seemed to finally get a decent backup for mailman going.
It's not super slick or anything but seems to work pretty decently, but
you can never be too sure or ask enough questions when it comes to stuff
like thisso any feed back would be appreciated.
We are running two linux debian
Hello
I have newly joined this list. These days I am working on a project that is
using mail man on linux. But I am facing a problem here. The messeges I am
sending to my mailing list are not available in my lists archive. Kindly help
me in solving this problem.
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Leonhardt
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:12 PM
To: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Postfix and default mailbox
Hi there,
I have a working mailman and postfix installation.
in my postfix config I have a virtual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well - that did it! I inserted a virtual map entry to forward the
mailinglist to another locally hosted domain without a default mailbox -
so mailman gets the mail in the end.
Thanks for your hint.
Hi all,
I am having troubles installing more than one instance on the same LINUX
FEDORA CORE 2 box.
The need arises from having to manage lists for more than one domain
(e.g. abitipuliti.org liste.cnms.it swazitalia.org ...)
I understand that installing multiple instances is the best choiche
I'm working on customizing the Mailman archive templates. I'm customizing
the HTML and need to generate dynamic text based on the listname, but when I
add a %(list_name)s in places, it doesn't get rendered dynamically. Instead
it shows up as %(list_name)s in the final HTML. How can I use the
Jeff Edwards wrote:
I'm working on customizing the Mailman archive templates. I'm customizing
the HTML and need to generate dynamic text based on the listname, but when I
add a %(list_name)s in places, it doesn't get rendered dynamically. Instead
it shows up as %(list_name)s in the final HTML.
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to apporove it. Any ideas???
The
reema jamil wrote:
I am facing a problem here. The messeges I am sending to my mailing list are
not available in my lists archive. Kindly help me in solving this problem.
Is 'archive' set to Yes on the admin Archiving Options page? Have you
set ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX to other than 2 in mm_cfg.py?
Kyle Pinkley wrote:
I am working with a server where some of the html pages got defaced via the
NeverEverNoSanity (old) worm). One of the pages that got defaced was the
index.html page of one of the archives
(/mailman/archives/public/list_name). How can I regenerate this file?
This file is
Jim == Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim I guess we just see system administration from different
Jim angles, I prefer communication to silence.
Of course. So does everybody. Specifically, so do the crackers.
Jim Barry/Tokio/Mark: Folks, yesterday we were informed of a
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
5. Security patches are asynchronous, like earthquakes, they happen
when they happen.
Very bad analogy. Hurricanes would be better. There is plenty of
potential for user-base warning before a patch is to be released.
If the patch comes out on Friday at 4:45, I
I have set up a list and all the emails that are going to the owner are
going to a person that is not on either the admin or moderator list.
Any idea why?
Using 2.1.6 Mailman
Charles
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
At 3:41 PM -0500 2006-01-27, Jim Popovitch wrote:
5. Security patches are asynchronous, like earthquakes, they happen
when they happen.
Very bad analogy. Hurricanes would be better. There is plenty of
potential for user-base warning before a patch is to be released.
No,
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 3:41 PM -0500 2006-01-27, Jim Popovitch wrote:
5. Security patches are asynchronous, like earthquakes, they happen
when they happen.
Very bad analogy. Hurricanes would be better. There is plenty of
potential for user-base warning before a patch is to be
Charles M. Owen wrote:
I have set up a list and all the emails that are going to the owner are
going to a person that is not on either the admin or moderator list.
Any idea why?
Did you see the reply to your prior post at
I just installed Mailman and it seemed to setup ok, until I tried to create
a new list using the web interface.
I'm running Fedora Core 3 with all the correct versions of Sendmail, Python,
Apache and Mailman.
My machine name is server1.my.domain
My web page is www.my.domain
All email addrs
Jim Popovitch wrote:
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 3:41 PM -0500 2006-01-27, Jim Popovitch wrote:
5. Security patches are asynchronous, like earthquakes, they happen
when they happen.
Very bad analogy. Hurricanes would be better. There is plenty of
potential for user-base warning before a
Peter Russell wrote:
I just installed Mailman and it seemed to setup ok, until I tried to
create a new list using the web interface.
I'm running Fedora Core 3 with all the correct versions of Sendmail,
Python,
Apache and Mailman.
My machine name is server1.my.domain
My web page is
Peter Russell wrote:
Mailman wants to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] when it should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using the web interface, (http://www.my.domain/mailman), whichever option I
select, it requests a page starting
Http://server1.my.domain..
If I manually change 'server1' to 'www' it works
Niemi Hannu wrote:
Is it only this list that fails? It is not likely a virtual
host problem as host really isn't involved in processing
confirmations.
I had to test the others. To be honest I haven't earlier used this kind of
user-driven subscription in any of the lists on that server, but
Davide Galletti wrote:
I am having troubles installing more than one instance on the same LINUX
FEDORA CORE 2 box.
The need arises from having to manage lists for more than one domain
(e.g. abitipuliti.org liste.cnms.it swazitalia.org ...)
I understand that installing multiple instances is the
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
That has already been done. There is something wrong.
Everyone is subscribed to the list as memebers and they are posting with the
same email as on the membership list.
Has anyone seen this before. Very weird ...
I saw it today on a list for one person out of a
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
Sorry, I did miss it somehow. I will post against this topic, since it is
more appropriate.
I am an end-user of a rented server. I do not have access to mailman
directly. What is MTA?
I did discover three things.
1) The person getting the unwanted message sent me a copy and it was to
Charles M. Owen wrote:
I am an end-user of a rented server. I do not have access to mailman
directly. What is MTA?
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.013.htp
I did discover three things.
1) The person getting the unwanted message sent me a copy and it was to
It reports to be 2.1.6. I will have to forward your comments to tech
support, but I have only one forwarder in my lists that was created by the
installation program provided. (You have indicated this forward is wrong,
thus unrouted/bad addresses go to the persons designated)
If you think of
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to
Jim == Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
5. Security patches are asynchronous, like earthquakes, they
happen when they happen.
Jim Very bad analogy. Hurricanes would be better. There is
Jim plenty of potential for user-base warning
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
What is the subscribed address?
What are the following headers in the message
From:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Jim == Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, if you prefer windstorms, hurricane is a bad analogy. Far more
accurate is tornado.0.1 wink
Hurricane is the most accurate analogy, because with hurricanes nobody
knows about them until the NWS (at least here in
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
Try unsub'ing and resub'ing him. Alternatively try logging into MM as
admin and mod'ing
39 matches
Mail list logo
