how to configure mailman(mailman server different with mail server), i have
problem
Jun 17 16:28:04 2008 (1388) Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection refused'),
msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 17 16:28:04 2008 (1388) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code -1:
(111, 'Connection
* Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of these
has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
delivery to «address» failed with code 450:
4.1.2 «address»: Recipient
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since your domain names don't change, you shouldn't need to do step 6.
For step 5, make sure that everything in lists/ and archives/ is your
mailman group.
I ran the following command:
chown -R mailman:mailman
I've had a request from a moderator for a list we run. They would like
to know if there is the ability to have multiple line Salutations (the
box under the email address when viewing the subscriber list) for
personalizations.
An example might be
John Adams
Vice President
Is there a new line
Carlos Williams wrote:
So now I am looking at path in the error I received:
OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/mailman.mbox'
[FAILED]
When I look at the path in the error on my server_old and
Dony Tata wrote:
how to configure mailman(mailman server different with mail server), i
have problem
Jun 17 16:28:04 2008 (1388) Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection refused'),
msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 17 16:28:04 2008 (1388) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code -1:
(111,
Stefan Förster wrote:
Not 100% related: What happens if my MTA does DNS validation and
rejects addresses who yield an NXDOMAIN (as opposed to a SERVFAIL)
with a permanent error code instead of creating a bounce?
You should turn off the DNS validation in the first place.
That said, I think
Steve Campbell wrote:
Is there a new line character that can be used line \n or something?
No, I don't think so. I think all characters that could potentially be
considered special by HTML will get stripped. And I don't think there's an
easy way around this problem.
You could always use
Brad Knowles wrote:
Steve Campbell wrote:
Is there a new line character that can be used line \n or something?
No, I don't think so. I think all characters that could potentially be
considered special by HTML will get stripped. And I don't think there's an
easy way around this problem.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Brad Knowles wrote:
Steve Campbell wrote:
Is there a new line character that can be used line \n or something?
No, I don't think so. I think all characters that could potentially be
considered special by HTML will get stripped. And I don't think there's
Allan Odgaard wrote:
I suggest updating the FAQ and/or improve the `who` command to return
concealed users to the list administrator.
It does since Mailman 2.1.10.
See FAQ 3.62 at http://wiki.list.org/x/aYA9 which says in part The
above two methods [who command and list roster] have the
All,
We saw some weird behavior on one of our lists about a month ago. It's
an internal list, and is meant to not be anonymous. All of a sudden,
the messages are coming from our -bounces address, and the users are
being obscured.
If you look at the archive, the names are being stored
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We saw some weird behavior on one of our lists about a month ago. It's
an internal list, and is meant to not be anonymous. All of a sudden,
the messages are coming from our -bounces address, and the users are
being obscured.
See FAQ 2.3 at
Brad Knowles wrote:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
When I look at the letters I receive from my list they do not have
my subscription address in the `Return-Path` header, so I suspect
VERP is disabled.
Correct.
I have placed the following in `/etc/mailman/mm_cfg:`
Brad Knowles wrote:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of these
has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
delivery to address failed with code 450:
4.1.2 address: Recipient address rejected:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is very wrong. There should be one archives/private/list.mbox
directory for each list and that directory should contain one
list.mbox file which is a mailbox contianing all posts archived for
the list. I.e., in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
I wanted to let you know that Terri Oda has written a nice script to
turn the old FAQ wizard into FAQ entries on the wiki. She and others
have spent some time gardening, tweaking and updating the wiki FAQ and
it is now ready to
This doesn't seem to be the behavior that we're seeing. It seemingly
happened out of the blue, and we can create a new mailing list which
behaves as it did before. The headers also do not contain From XXX on
Behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original user is being obscured from the
headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't seem to be the behavior that we're seeing. It seemingly
happened out of the blue, and we can create a new mailing list which
behaves as it did before. The headers also do not contain From XXX on
Behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original user is being
Sorry, should have mentioned that.
The anonymous_list is set to No, and changing it to Yes makes posts
in the archive anonymous too (presently, only the emails are anonymous,
not the archive). Changing it back from Yes to No shows the exact
same behavior as well.
Thinking about it, if mailman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The anonymous_list is set to No, and changing it to Yes makes posts
in the archive anonymous too (presently, only the emails are anonymous,
not the archive). Changing it back from Yes to No shows the exact
same behavior as well.
This makes me suspect the MTA. See
Allan Odgaard wrote:
On a new list I had this set in `mm_cfg.py` at creation time:
OLD_STYLE_PREFIXING = No
This caused extra spaces between the tag inserted and the subject for
letters sent to the list.
I suspected that this option was the problem, but I was unable to
disable it
Allan Odgaard wrote:
Some of my subscribers have accents and similar in their name and I
had to do the following post install to have Mailman properly work
with these:
## CLI
In order to get `list_members -f «list»` to properly output non-ASCII
user names I had to put the following:
I recently noticed an address on a list and there is a checkmark and a ?
(question mark) in the Nomail column. I understand what that means and the
longer description is:
Note: your list delivery is currently disabled; it was disabled for unknown
reasons
Fine, but I know for a fact that this
Christopher Adams wrote:
I recently noticed an address on a list and there is a checkmark and a ?
(question mark) in the Nomail column. I understand what that means and the
longer description is:
Note: your list delivery is currently disabled; it was disabled for unknown
reasons
Fine, but I
how to configure selinux on centos 5 , i use postfix and mailman,if selinux set
enabled, i have got error in /var/log/mailman/error command failed:
/usr/sbin/postalias /etc/mailman/aliases (status: 1, Operation not permitted),
if selinux set disabled, it's work fine. But i want set selinux to
26 matches
Mail list logo
