Hi all
I can't get my digests to be sended in other than MIME although Plain Text
is selected. Any way to get this solved ? I have access to the server if any
CLI need to be used. I'm running 2.1.11
Thanks and Regards
--
Matthieu HUTIN
Ceux qui ne luttent pas contre le mal, finissent par le
Matthieu HUTIN wrote:
I can't get my digests to be sended in other than MIME although Plain Text
is selected. Any way to get this solved ? I have access to the server if any
CLI need to be used. I'm running 2.1.11
Check the messages in the digest, as well as the digest header and
footer.
Matthieu HUTIN wrote:
I've done a test by sending an email myself. I always send email as plain
test (I hate HTMl in mails ;-) ) So it should have been digested as plain
texte according to my setup. However I may be wrong as this is the first
time i'm facing this issues. It's been working
Dennis Putnam wrote;
I am having a problem getting the reply-to header configured for
confirmations. Due to some email restrictions from my ISP I cannot use
the default (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Thus when a user
tries to reply to a confirmation, it bounces (it needs to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).I
Brad Knowles wrote:
Matthieu HUTIN wrote:
I can't get my digests to be sended in other than MIME although Plain Text
is selected. Any way to get this solved ? I have access to the server if any
CLI need to be used. I'm running 2.1.11
Check the messages in the digest, as well as the digest
Thanks for the reply.
OK, to be clear the problem is one of mailbox name length. Another list
member replied privately and questioned that so I will repost that
information here.
The number characters in my list name plus the '-request' is 6 characters too
many. I could change the list names
Dennis Putnam wrote:
OK, to be clear the problem is one of mailbox name length. Another
list member replied privately and questioned that so I will repost
that information here.
The number characters in my list name plus the '-request' is 6
characters too many. I could change the list
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Still, if you can use VERP_CONFIRMATIONS, it would make the code
modifications simpler because of the way the address is generated. The
difference is without VERP_CONFIRMATIONS, the message is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Subject: confirm xx...
and
Well, I noticed that there are files in the :
/var/lib/mailman/data/bounce-events-*.pck
where * are numbers ..
considering their sizes (3-50MBs) they aren't that bad but with time, they pile
up and fill the disk space.. is it safe to delete these files?
Thanks..
Date: Fri, 31 Oct
Dennis Putnam wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Still, if you can use VERP_CONFIRMATIONS, it would make the code
modifications simpler because of the way the address is generated. The
difference is without VERP_CONFIRMATIONS, the message is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Subject: confirm
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dennis Putnam wrote:
The implication is exactly what I said above. The aditional implication
is that a reply which is addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has to be delivered the same as
if it were addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then that won't work either.
Since
faisal anif wrote:
Well, I noticed that there are files in the :
/var/lib/mailman/data/bounce-events-*.pck
where * are numbers ..
considering their sizes (3-50MBs) they aren't that bad but with time, they
pile up and fill the disk space.. is it safe to delete these files?
They
12 matches
Mail list logo
