Re: [Mailman-Users] Corrupted archives ...

Mark Sapiro said the following on 8/12/09 10:05 AM: > Do you see these Dec. 1999 messages when you look with Mutt? > *doublechecking* Yes. They look fine. > It looks like someone or some script ran bin/arch on Mon Aug 10 > 18:53:40 EDT 2009 (and possibly at other times) with some spurious > in

[Mailman-Users] Postfix vdomains with multiple instances of mailman

Jeffrey Goldberg writes: > For one mailman instance, I will have in > > /usr/local/mailman/vhosts/lists.wilson-pta.org/data/virtual-domains > > # STANZA START: pta-board > # CREATED: Wed Aug 12 17:17:42 2009 > pta-bo...@lists.wilson-pta.org pta-board > /usr/

[Mailman-Users] Postfix vdomains with multiple instances of mailman

In trying to get things like pta-bo...@one-domain.example and pta-bo...@second-domain.example to be distinct lists on a site that is hosting both of those domains, I attempted to install multiple instances of Mailman on the same host. That is advice that I saw somewhere on this list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Multiple instances of Mailman on FreeBSD

On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Mel Flynn wrote: On Wednesday 12 August 2009 11:40:47 Bill Moran wrote: Were it me, I'd add jails to the system. [...] That's obviously not the only way to get what you want, just my suggestion. And mine. Thank you and Bill for the jail suggestion. I've nev

Re: [Mailman-Users] Multiple instances of Mailman on FreeBSD

On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Wednesday, August 12, 2009 13:55:18 -0500 Jeffrey Goldberg > wrote: I'm posting this to both the mailman-users list and the freebsd-ports list. I realize that not all follow-up will make it to both lists. But when I do % cd /usr/port

Re: [Mailman-Users] Multiple instances of Mailman on FreeBSD

On Aug 12, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: I would like to set up multiple instances of Mailman on a FreeBSD 7- STABLE system with using Postfix. Personally, I wouldn't use the [FreeBSD] ports version if you want to do multiple instances of Mailman. I would in

[Mailman-Users] MM 2.1.12 in Gentoo stable - NOT!

On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 13:30 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > As of today, MM 2.1.12 is in Gentoo stable. I mis-spoke. Apparently this isn't yet the case, although I would expect it to be so within a week or so. Sorry -- Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works if you let it" FMP Computer

Re: [Mailman-Users] Multiple instances of Mailman on FreeBSD

Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: I'm posting this to both the mailman-users list and the freebsd-ports list. I realize that not all follow-up will make it to both lists. I would like to set up multiple instances of Mailman on a FreeBSD 7-STABLE system with using Postfix. Looking at the ports Makefil

[Mailman-Users] Multiple instances of Mailman on FreeBSD

I'm posting this to both the mailman-users list and the freebsd-ports list. I realize that not all follow-up will make it to both lists. I would like to set up multiple instances of Mailman on a FreeBSD 7- STABLE system with using Postfix. Looking at the ports Makefile, it appears that if

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing not working - Update

On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 13:02 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > I found a thread on the Gentoo bug reporting list which discusses > compatibility issues between Mailman 2.1.11 and Python 2.6, also > possibly 2.5 (which I'm running on these boxes). Gentoo is > distributing mm 2.1.11 with stable as of y

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing not working - Update

Mark, thanks for your knowledgeable and _very_ helpful post! On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:41 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Lindsay Haisley wrote: > >First, an egregious number of "Bounce action notifications" and "list > >unsubscribe notifications" went out on bounces for lists on which I'm > >listed as

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing not working - Update

Lindsay Haisley wrote: >I restarted (twice) the qrunner suite of processes from the system >command line using the system init scripts (/etc/init.d/mailman) with >two noticeable results. > >First, an egregious number of "Bounce action notifications" and "list >unsubscribe notifications" went out o

Re: [Mailman-Users] New, odd issue... WAS: Fixed (never mind) WAS: How do I kill a message...

J.A. Terranson wrote: > >I have four lists, yet three of them are OK, thie first is giving errors, >but not in the error file. Ideads> When I browse to it it sits >*forever*, then said Opps, we had na error! Ichedked the error file, and >nothing... Check for stale locks. See the FAQ at

Re: [Mailman-Users] How do I kill a message in the middle ofbeingdistributed?

J.A. Terranson wrote: > ># bin/show_qfiles ./qfiles/in >> ./qfiles/in >Traceback (most recent call last): > File "bin/show_qfiles", line 95, in >main() > File "bin/show_qfiles", line 81, in main >fp = open(filename) >IOError: [Errno 21] Is a directory bin/show_qfile

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce processing not working

Lindsay Haisley Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:02:55 -0500 To: mailman-users@python.org Cc: Slim Richey >I have a list (several lists, actually) running on Mailman 2.1.11 and it >looks as if bounce processing is broken. On the list in question, the >following are set: > >bounce_processi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Users' names on roster page

Eric Shubert wrote: >I would like to see the users' names (which I know are optional) on the >List Subscribers page (http://domain/mailman/roster/list). Is there an >option for this that I missed, or would it require a program change? It's in Mailman 2.2 (not released yet). There is a 2.1 patc

Re: [Mailman-Users] Running two list with same email prefix

Andrea Cappelli wrote: >I'm running a mail server with Debian Lenny, MTA is Postfix and i will >use postfix-to-mailma.py script to run list > >I would set up Mailman for running mailing list with same email prefix >on different domains, obvious with different list names > >For example we have ml.d

Re: [Mailman-Users] Corrupted archives ...

Glenn Sieb wrote: > >I'm running mailman-2.1.12, with the htdig patches on FreeBSD 7.0 > >I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive >mbox size is 175M. > >I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 "No >subject" emails that "look funny." > >So I