Jim Popovitch writes:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull
step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Jim Popovitch writes:
Bingo! The dmarc folks (many of who are IETF participants) ignored
and performed an end-run around the standards process.
Not really. The basic
Keith Bierman wrote:
The obvious downside is that reply to poster stops working
It doesn't in the From: Munging/Message wrapping feature in Mailman
2.1.16+. The poster's From: is merged into her possibly empty Reply-To:.
--
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San
On 04/14/2014 09:19 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
FWIW, here's a list of the DNs of subscriber addresses that got
unsubscribed last week from one of FMP's lists, ostensibly as a result
of the DMARC issue:
yahoo.com
hotmail.com
comcast.net
bellsouth.net
att.net
cityofgastonia.com
Seriously? AOL/MSN as well? My users are going to be pissed.
Who’s going to blink first here?
-Conrad
--
Is there a suspect in your family? Contact the Ministry of Information. Ring
100 00 00.
On Apr 15, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
On 04/14/2014 09:19 PM,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Conrad G T Yoder
cgtyo...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Seriously? AOL/MSN as well? My users are going to be pissed.
Just to be clear, all those domains (other than yahoo.com) will bounce
email to you if your list sends out an email from a yahoo.com
subscriber. It's
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I thought Mark was saying that these had
implemented the DMARC rules as well.
-Conrad
--
DO NOT FOLD, SPINDLE, MUTILATE
On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Conrad G T Yoder
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Conrad G T Yoder
cgtyo...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I thought Mark was saying that these had
implemented the DMARC rules as well.
Well, technically they have implemented the DMARC rules. Yahoo.com
publishes a dmarc record (dig
Yes, sorry for my sloppy language. I appreciate the clarification.
-Conrad
On April 15, 2014 9:49:55 AM PDT, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Conrad G T Yoder
cgtyo...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I thought Mark was saying that
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 12:38 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Just to be clear, all those domains (other than yahoo.com) will bounce
email to you if your list sends out an email from a yahoo.com
subscriber. It's not the case that you need to prevent all those
other domains (AOL/MSN/etc) from
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 12:38 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Just to be clear, all those domains (other than yahoo.com) will bounce
email to you if your list sends out an email from a yahoo.com
subscriber. It's not the case
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
So just to be clear, putting a damper on this at this point requires
_only_ that posts from yahoo.com be blocked from posting to a list. Is
this correct? This can be done by selectively unsubscribing (or
Hi,
Le 13/04/2014 17:55, Mark Sapiro a écrit :
withlist is the tool for this. +
http://www.msapiro.net/scripts/test_handler.py
I also updated the FAQ at http://wiki.list.org/x/l4A9 to point to this script.
Thanks, it saves me a lot of re-testing boring emails. Especially useful
as I never
On 16 Apr 2014, at 4:05 am, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
So just to be clear, putting a damper on this at this point requires
_only_ that posts from yahoo.com be blocked from posting to a list. Is
this correct? This can be done by selectively unsubscribing (or
moderating) current
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Peter Shute psh...@nuw.org.au wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 4:05 am, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
So just to be clear, putting a damper on this at this point requires
_only_ that posts from yahoo.com be blocked from posting to a list. Is
this correct?
On 16 Apr 2014, at 6:23 am, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Peter Shute psh...@nuw.org.au wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 4:05 am, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
So just to be clear, putting a damper on this at this point requires
_only_ that posts
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Conrad G T Yoder con...@yoders.org wrote:
On Apr 15, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 12:38 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Just to be clear, all
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 21:58 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Correct. But that could all change tomorrow if they do add dmarc
records for those domains.
This is a pretty big deal, and it's been a week or more since Yahoo
pulled this stunt. What kind of blowback are they getting, and is there
any
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 21:58 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Correct. But that could all change tomorrow if they do add dmarc
records for those domains.
This is a pretty big deal, and it's been a week or more since Yahoo
18 matches
Mail list logo
