Le 20/03/2015 08:16, Peter Shute a écrit :
Getting off the subject, do you mean selecting quoted text, or any
text? I've never used an Android device, and I assumed that this kind
of basic task would be easier than on an iPhone. Perhaps not.
selecting old text to trim it. May be I have too
On 20 Mar 2015, at 6:20 pm, jdd j...@dodin.org wrote:
Le 20/03/2015 08:16, Peter Shute a écrit :
Getting off the subject, do you mean selecting quoted text, or any
text? I've never used an Android device, and I assumed that this kind
of basic task would be easier than on an iPhone.
Le 20/03/2015 01:45, Mark Sapiro a écrit :
This is a major hot-button issue for me, The above is only scratching
the surface.
smartphones makes things horrible, on android, selecting text for
deletion is nearly impossible :-((
jdd
--
On 20 Mar 2015, at 6:05 pm, jdd j...@dodin.org wrote:
Le 20/03/2015 01:45, Mark Sapiro a écrit :
This is a major hot-button issue for me, The above is only scratching
the surface.
smartphones makes things horrible, on android, selecting text for
deletion is nearly impossible :-((
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Andrew Stuart wrote:
When I reply to a message on a mailing list, what is the ???right??? way
to do it?
Not sure if there is a right way for everybody. Definitely there is a way
I like it to happen and ways which I find extremely annoying.
Should I be deleting
Hi
Every time I send a message, or anyone for that matter, a duplicate message
is received. The avoid duplicate button is off. Can you help please?
Regards Len
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
On 03/20/2015 02:59 AM, len ward wrote:
Hi
Every time I send a message, or anyone for that matter, a duplicate message
is received. The avoid duplicate button is off. Can you help please?
If avoid duplicates is Off, you will receive duplicates if you are a
direct recipient of the message.
On 3/20/15 9:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/19/2015 6:47 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button the program
will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied to came
from a list and offer a Reply to List option in addition
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:07 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
I'm sure I'm proudly in the minority, but I use Claws Mail almost
exclusively
and it has very good reply-to-list support.
Sounds like Thunderbird's 'Smart Reply' button, which I really like, but
don't use much because I can't place it
On 03/20/2015 06:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/19/2015 6:47 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button the program
will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied to came
from a list and offer a Reply to List option in
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 09:52 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button the program
will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied to came
from a list and offer a Reply to List option in addition to a simple
reply, which generally goes
Sent from the Dehut/Haisley iPad
email househ...@fmp.com
On Mar 20, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Lindsay Haisley writes:
As far as editing, top posting, bottom posting, etc. it's just a matter
of using good sense.
This list strongly prefers
Hello!
I've set
generic_nonmember_action to Hold
and
nonmember_rejection_notice to my reject notice.
But when I reject message from admindb page,
I get general message with not mine but standard reason:
---
The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:
Your message was
On 3/20/2015 10:03 AM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
On 03/20/2015 06:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/19/2015 6:47 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button the program
will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied
Thanks, Richard and Mark, for responses.
Richard wrote:
I suspect that it isn't that the list added the name after the
Re:, but that the MUA left it there and added the Re: first,
and the list saw that the tag was already in the message and
left it there. This keeps the subject tidy.
**I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/2015 11:55 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Yes, but if the post was sent twice to each list, the Received:
headers of the two posts you received must differ in detail.
I copied the View-Message Source information in two text files and
compared them
On 3/20/2015 1:29 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
I don't know of anybody who prefers bottom-posting (and it's a bad
idea to use that term as I've seen newbies instructed to bottom-post
do exactly that, leaving 50 lines of original text and adding two
lines at the bottom).
On 3/19/2015 6:47 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button the program
will analyze the headers, determine that the post being replied to came
from a list and offer a Reply to List option in addition to a simple
reply, which generally
On Mar 20, 2015, at 03:23 AM, Peter Shute psh...@nuw.org.au wrote:
If you're referring to the problem of getting the selection boundaries in
exactly the right spot, I'm well familiar with that. So easy to get them
within one or two characters, but requires excessive concentration and
While in the topic of replying, why does mailman put the
Re: before the [listname]? Or rather inserts the list
name after the Re: ? (For you send it out as Re: The right way)
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] The right way to reply to a mailing
list
It likely is my odd taste, and perhaps
On Mar 20, 2015, at 09:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I'd really like to know which email user agents really do this.
In my experience, none of the ones used by 99+% of the worlds population
actually use do this.
I'm sure I'm proudly in the minority, but I use Claws Mail almost exclusively
and it has
On 3/20/15 8:27 AM, A.K. Eyma wrote:
Having all mail of a list come in with [listname] first in
each subject line is more tidy. In that way you would
differentiate at one glance in your inbox between
Re: [Mailman-Users] The right way
for responses that have been sent offlist to you
and
On 3/20/2015 9:58 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015, at 09:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I'd really like to know which email user agents really do this.
In my experience, none of the ones used by 99+% of the worlds population
actually use do this.
I'm sure I'm proudly in
On 03/20/2015 07:32 AM, Marco Stoecker wrote:
On 03/19/2015 11:55 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Yes, but if the post was sent twice to each list, the Received:
headers of the two posts you received must differ in detail.
I copied the View-Message Source information in two text files and
compared
On 03/20/2015 07:08 AM, Danil Smirnov wrote:
I've set
generic_nonmember_action to Hold
and
nonmember_rejection_notice to my reject notice.
But when I reject message from admindb page,
I get general message with not mine but standard reason:
...
Is this a bug?
You can consider that
On 3/20/2015 10:27 AM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
My MUA of choice is Evolution, formerly from Ximian but now a gnome GPL
project. It has this feature, as does Thunderbird, which is fairly
popular. I was under the impression that Outlook and/or Outlook Express
had it too, but I'm
2015-03-20 16:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net:
You can consider that it's a bug if you wish and report it at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+filebug, but it is the intentional
behavior.
Okay I see Mark. But there is no any other way to include reason of
rejecting to notice.
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ummm... this is not what you said initially.
You said In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button
the program will analyze the headers, determine that the post being
replied to came from a list and offer a Reply to List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is somewhere between your mail client and Postfix on the
Mailman server. It's not Mailman. Are you certain you didn't just
send the message twice?
I'm very sure because in the outbox it appears only ones. And I copied
the headers again, just to
Mark Sapiro writes:
There is one case with Mailman lists where [to vs. cc] matters, at
least in MM 2.1, but I think MM 3 too.
If a list member has 'avoid dups' set and that member is a Cc: addressee
of a post, that member will not receive the post from the list AND that
member's
Lindsay Haisley writes:
I never quite understood all the fuss about top posting.
Usenet over UUCP via 300 baud modems on backbone servers with 5MB
disks.[1]
The reason behind quoting in the first place is to provide context
for a reply, but some MUAs make it very difficult to not top
jdd writes:
Le 20/03/2015 01:45, Mark Sapiro a écrit :
This is a major hot-button issue for me, The above is only scratching
the surface.
smartphones makes things horrible, on android, selecting text for
deletion is nearly impossible :-((
This is true.
On many lists I
On 03/19/2015 10:39 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Andrew Stuart writes:
and does it matter what other addresses go into to and cc fields.
It doesn't matter for mechanical purposes. To, CC, and BCC are all
routed the same way (using RCPT TO aka envelope recipient at the
SMTP level),
On 03/20/2015 05:27 AM, A.K. Eyma wrote:
While in the topic of replying, why does mailman put the
Re: before the [listname]? Or rather inserts the list
name after the Re: ? (For you send it out as Re: The right way)
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] The right way to reply to a mailing
list
On 3/20/2015 11:09 AM, Lindsay Haisley fmo...@fmp.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
You said In many mail user agents, when you press the Reply button
the program will analyze the headers, determine that the post being
replied to came from a list and offer a Reply
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:37 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Only superficially. The point is that both of these MUAs are
list-aware
and offer options appropriately.
No, the point is you apparently can't simply acknowledge that you
mis-spoke/made a mistake.
Tanstaafl, it it will make you happy,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2015 05:12 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 03/20/2015 08:42 AM, Marco Stoecker wrote:
Mar 18 22:16:43 hostname postfix/smtpd[9815]: 6D42445B:
client=localhost[::1] Mar 18 22:16:43 hostname
postfix/cleanup[9818]: 6D42445B:
On 03/20/2015 08:42 AM, Marco Stoecker wrote:
What are the rest of the postfix log messages from 'grep 6D42445B'
and 'grep 4ACCAD07' of the log file?
and here it comes...
for grep 6D42445B:
Mar 18 22:16:43 hostname postfix/smtpd[9815]: 6D42445B:
client=localhost[::1]
Mar 18
On 03/20/2015 07:55 AM, Danil Smirnov wrote:
Probably it would be better to add feature request to add filed for
custom rejecting reason
on Admindb page than consider this as a bug?...
If you go to the detail of a message in the admindb interface (click the
[n] link or the 'view all
39 matches
Mail list logo
