Re: [Mailman-Users] stopping cross posting?

2016-10-11 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/10/2016 05:44 PM, Adam Morris wrote: > > > > Not sure if I'm using the correct terminology. > > > You are. > > > > People send messages to a list I run as well as other lists that I have > > nothing to do with. > > > > > > When people reply to the message sent to

Re: [Mailman-Users] stopping cross posting?

2016-10-11 Thread willi uebelherr
Dear friends, this discussion is mostly negative oriented. I will add a positive consideration. The cross-posting is very important to open the spaces, to connect different areas. For the list server is not a big problem. If senders are not subscribed, they blocked. Simple. The sender get this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message.UserNotification vs Message.OwnerNotification in Handlers/Hold.py

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 10/11/2016 08:37 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > The emails fail DMARC because the From: is the virtual list domain, > but the Sender is set to the site-list (often a neutral domain used > for the MTA that hosts the virtual lists). OpenDKIM signs based on > the Sender (see: "MAILING LISTS" at >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message.UserNotification vs Message.OwnerNotification in Handlers/Hold.py

2016-10-11 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Jim Popovitch writes: > > > I've noticed that Mailman "hold" notifications (to:list-owner@) > > fail DMARC (if the mailing list domain has a _dmarc RR) because of > > a simple code issue.