On 1 Aug 2018 at 17:30, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Can you provide steps of how you set up Mailman on the different
> providers since it looks like you are using some type of packaged or
> managed service which is providing features that are not part of the
> stock Mailman and may get in the way of
On 08/01/2018 09:43 AM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
>
> And I tried my program on the Bluehost version and I was greeted with
>
> Not Acceptable!Not
> Acceptable!An appropriate representation of the requested
> resource could not be found on this server. This error was generated by
> Mod_Security.<
Hi,
Can you provide steps of how you set up Mailman on the different providers
since it looks like you are using some type of packaged or managed service
which is providing features that are not part of the stock Mailman and may get
in the way of what you are trying to do. It is difficult to
I'm still working on the auto-submission stuff. I set up another test mailing
list, this one on Bluehost. First, I compared the HTML of the
members/unsubscribe page and they are *identical* [except for having
different URLs for the links to the various pages].
And I tried my program on the
Jordan Brown writes:
> Wasn't this in the context of signature-checking schemes that detect
> forged origin metadata?
Context, yes. The question is did Intuit need extreme accuracy for
that? Maybe they did, but I see no evidence for that need.
Intuit was not a financial intermediary. It
Reply-To set to Mailman-Developers. Please clean up your header if
you use Reply-All.
Richard Damon writes:
> It would be nice if Mailman could tell the MTA as it was receiving the
> message that it wasn't acceptable so it could be rejected then, but
> since it generally can't, you need to
