Mark Sapiro writes:
> On 11/24/18 9:17 PM, Jayson Smith wrote:
> > I had a Mailman/DNS problem after upgrading a lot of packages. A
> > message came in, Mailman couldn't properly look up the DMARC
> > policy of the sending ISP, didn't munge the From: and sent the
> > message on its way...
>
On 11/28/18 1:39 PM, Jim Ziobro wrote:
>
> As I was working on this I came to understand more about how Mailman
> works. I now realize that mm-handler would not be necessary if Mailman
> fully connected to Sendmail. The Postfix connection looks very close.
> I'll take a crack at it.
See
On 11/28/2018 02:39 PM, Jim Ziobro wrote:
I now realize that mm-handler would not be necessary if Mailman fully
connected to Sendmail. The Postfix connection looks very close.
Please elaborate on what you mean by "if Mailman fully connected to
Sendmail". Rather, how is Mailman not already
I started with the 2008 version of mm-handler. My original goal was to
fix a couple of bugs: lower case conversion and forwarding mail to
POSTMASTER. But I rewrote it to remove stuff which will never get
executed and remove other things which might cause future bugs.
mm-handler went from
