Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead

2019-04-13 Thread Dmitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:05:39 +1000 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > If you're running MM2 under Python 2.7, and you also have Python 3.7 > installed, the two Python interpreters don't share packages unless > you're doing something unusual. So updating one version of the > installed package shouldn't

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead in 2020 what are people's plans with mailman2?

2019-04-13 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 4/10/19 7:36 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 4/10/19 12:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> The path forward is to increase the community of MM 3 users which will >> result in more people contributing to the project and faster progress. > > On that note, I migrated my half-dozen lists (a few hundred

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead

2019-04-13 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 03:25:50PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk via Mailman-Users wrote: > The problem is reliance on third-party libraries coupled with absence of > usable package management system. It will "generally" run within the > same major interpreter version unless it imports a package that

Re: [Mailman-Users] Now that Python 2 is dead

2019-04-13 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Matthew Goebel writes: > Won't redhat just apply/support fixes provided the software vendor? For RHEL, no, they'll do a lot more than that if it's covered by the support contract. That's the business model: if they were just providing the integration testing, Centos would eat their lunch. >