Mark Dale writes:
> We had a customer ask for their lists to have this option. Their
> lists are used with some kind of automated entry/exit logging
> processes.
Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
> Ack. It's a narrow need, but there are reasons. Not every list is for raw
> public
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 6:41 PM, Dennis Carr
> wrote:
>
> Hey, guys.
> ...
> So to this end, my thought is to route that mail over to a separate
> -admins list instead of 'mailman list admins'. The expected side
> effect is that this will wind up in the -admins list "not-subscribed"
> trap.
Hey, guys.
I have a multi-admin list which has a number of administrators that is
greater than one who all are volunteer admins. The side effect is that
the -owners alias tends to get spammed - and in some cases, it can get
spammed quite profusely. (Coming to mind are spams from fqdn qq.com -
On 4/18/19 10:05 AM, Andy Cravens wrote:
> Using mailman 2.1.26. I have a list that is going to be retired and I need
> to stop people from posting to the old list. However, I don’t want to delete
> the list quite yet. Also, I need to auto-reply to any attempted posters that
> the list is
Using mailman 2.1.26. I have a list that is going to be retired and I need to
stop people from posting to the old list. However, I don’t want to delete the
list quite yet. Also, I need to auto-reply to any attempted posters that the
list is being replaced with a new list. I have a plan but
On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 17:23 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Mark Dale writes:
>
> > I've posted some notes on restricting a list's archive to Administrators
> > only. They may be of use to some folks.
>
> Could you say something about the use case? If there's a common
> enough reason for
> Mark Dale writes:
> > I've posted some notes on restricting a list's archive to Administrators
> > only. They may be of use to some folks.
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp]
> Again, I'm not saying these are bad ideas, just that I want more
>
Mark Dale writes:
> I've posted some notes on restricting a list's archive to Administrators
> only. They may be of use to some folks.
Could you say something about the use case? If there's a common
enough reason for doing this, we (the committers) should think about
adding such features to
