Dennis Putnam writes:
> Since migrating to mailman 3 on the latest RHEL is going to take some
> time, I need an interim solution to DMARC mitigation. I understand
> version 2.1.18
Why 2.1.18? Do you have that already installed? It's already pretty
old, and many of the fixes still being made
On 2/16/20 1:10 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> One question, Mark. Are the spam filter rules ("header_filter_rules")
> applied _before_ or _after_ a message with a uuencoded (base64) From
> address is decoded?
As I said before, header_filter_rules are matched against the decoded
headers.
> If
On 2/16/20 12:44 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> Possible. The "Reason" is "The message headers matched a filter rule"
Then there must be a rule with Hold action before (above) your discard
rule, and as I've noted, your discard rule is way too broad, matching a
character class rather than a
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 12:08 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> A match on a header_filter_rule with a Hold action.
One question, Mark. Are the spam filter rules ("header_filter_rules")
applied _before_ or _after_ a message with a uuencoded (base64) From
address is decoded?
If _before_ (matching what we
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 12:08 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Munged a few words.
>
> On 2/15/20 11:20 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> > The only filter relevant to this issue is "(?i)Subject: .*[f...]".
>
> The (?i) is irrelevant as the match always ignores case. Also, I don't
> think that's what you
Munged a few words.
On 2/15/20 11:20 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> The only filter relevant to this issue is "(?i)Subject: .*[f...]".
The (?i) is irrelevant as the match always ignores case. Also, I don't
think that's what you want as it will match any Subject that contains
any of the letters f,
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 14:09 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
> One thing to note is that you seem to have two different filters at work
> here, one being non-member post, which you want to Discard, and messages
> with 'bad' words in the subject, which you define to Hold. A message
> which matches
One thing to note is that you seem to have two different filters at work
here, one being non-member post, which you want to Discard, and messages
with 'bad' words in the subject, which you define to Hold. A message
which matches both filters will be acted by the first filter that the
message
Here's a more concise summary:
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 20:00 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 2/15/20 5:58 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > We're running Mailman 2.1.18-1 and have a list which is having a porn
> > spam problem. The list is set to discard posts from non-members, and
> > the list
