[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Chip Davis
OK guys, what's really going on here? Stephen and Mark, you are both thoughtful writers and crucial members of the Mailman team.  Jim, you have made a generous offer that seems to have the support of the Mailman 2 user community, at least. Is this about turf?  Is there something about Jim's

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 03:53 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > > > Again with the "Jim's team". Those other guys, that other group, them > > folks That's nauseating to hear from you Stephen. > > I use the word "team" to describe people who work

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > Again with the "Jim's team". Those other guys, that other group, them > folks That's nauseating to hear from you Stephen. I use the word "team" to describe people who work together closely to achieve common goals. That's just English. The team

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Jonathan M
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:37 PM Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > A couple of days ago, over on the MAILOP mailinglist, there was a long > thread titled 'Mailman confirmation email denial of service'. This > detailed some of the problems we've all seen with Mailman

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2020-08-26 21:28:30 (+0800), Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: So, I have volunteered to spearhead an effort to add one or two more people to the Mailman Coders group[2] in order to vet and approve new features that continue the long tradition of providing value to Mailman 2.x. Who's